Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
I just want this thing to become a real live case and go to trial. The .5/10 guy sues based on libel... she uses truth as a defense.
On the truth issue, would the trial be about this dude's sexual prowess not measuring up? Would she call witnesses who can testify as to the objectivity of her research and the large and diverse sample size from which she derived her conclusions? Does her research pass Daubert? These are things the public needs to know.
I want that on CourtTV. I would pay PPV for that.
|
So many "pro bono" jokes, so little time.
Threaded Mode
