Duke coed's sexual history "senior thesis" goes viral

[AnotherKD]

Her parents must be so proud.

[DrPhil]

She's an idiot.

There would be a different twist if this was a man with a list of sexcapades with women.

[33girl]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

She's an idiot.

There would be a different twist if this was a man with a list of sexcapades with women.

What? Or are you making a comment on the fact that men are usually that stupid.

[ThetaPrincess24]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

She's an idiot.

There would be a different twist if this was a man with a list of sexcapades with women.

Likely!

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

She's an idiot.

There would be a different twist if this was a man with a list of sexcapades with women.

It really would be interesting - especially considering that discussion of this type is generally considered more "masculine" (even though in my experience and my limited understanding of the research, women discuss [truthful] sexual escapades much more often and in far greater detail). Particularly with her extended discussion of donger size and the male's aggressiveness, I almost feel like a male 'equivalent' discussion would be derided as the "usual chauvinist piggery" or whatever by some, and straight-up applauded by others.

The comparisons some sites have made between her and Tucker Max are particularly telling, since the two have almost nothing in common in terms of writing style or goal.

Ultimately, it's awkward and kind of funny, and likely terrible for her because everything lives on the internet forever. The job offers etc. will be fleeting - grandkids stumbling upon it is slightly more permanent. That might be the lesson, even though the feminist-supporting-man-dude inside of me would like there to be a larger one. HA LARGER ONE - TAKE THAT, RED SOX PROSPECT EXCORIATED IN PRINT!

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

It really would be interesting - especially considering that discussion of this type is generally considered more "masculine" (even though in my experience and my limited understanding of the research, women discuss [truthful] sexual escapades much more often and in far greater detail). Particularly with her extended discussion of donger size and the male's aggressiveness, I almost feel like a male 'equivalent' discussion would be derided as the "usual chauvinist piggery" or whatever by some, and straight-up applauded by others.

The comparisons some sites have made between her and Tucker Max are particularly telling, since the two have almost nothing in common in terms of writing style or goal.

Ultimately, it's awkward and kind of funny, and likely terrible for her because everything lives on the internet forever. The job offers etc. will be fleeting - grandkids stumbling upon it is slightly more permanent. That might be the lesson, even though the feminist-supporting-man-dude inside of me would like there to be a larger one. HA LARGER ONE - TAKE THAT, RED SOX PROSPECT EXCORIATED IN PRINT!

I agree with all of this. LOL.

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

The comparisons some sites have made between her and Tucker Max are particularly telling, since the two have almost nothing in common in terms of writing style or goal.

But they do have Duke (and He's Not Here in Chapel Hill) in common.