GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 332,785
Threads: 115,741
Posts: 2,208,419
Welcome to our newest member, alexisshlze855
» Online Users: 4,634
0 members and 4,634 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 08-06-2010, 11:53 PM
AGDee AGDee is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drolefille View Post
Basically that's what marriage does now, except that all those things you would have to write up separately are codified in a vast multitude of laws and are granted automatically at signing. Honestly the biggest problem with the institution of marriage is that people are unwilling to mentally and emotionally disassociate the religious and personal aspects of marriage from the government benefits.

If it is a legal contract there should be no gender restrictions on it.

I'm not opposed to your ideal EW but I think it's far beyond what's plausible in the forseeable future.
I agree with you, Drole. That is what marriage does now except that the contract doesn't have to be written for every single couple who wants to enter into that contract. They get one license that in turn stipulates all the other legalities. I really don't understand what people mean when they refer to a civil union because, in the United States, that's exactly what marriage is. If you were REQUIRED to involve a religious entity in a marriage, then it would not be a civil union, it would be a religious ceremony. However, you can have all the religious ceremonies you want and you are not married unless you have a license. That makes marriage a civil union as it stands right now. Nobody distinguishes between the ceremony performed by a justice of the peace vs. a Catholic priest vs. a rabbi vs. a minister, etc. Marriage is a civil union. Those who choose to make it more by including a religious component are no more married than those who do not.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prop 8 Nov. 15 Protest a.e.B.O.T. News & Politics 152 12-10-2008 02:05 AM
Prop 8 - The Musical LightBulb Entertainment 7 12-05-2008 01:30 PM
Michigan's Prop 2 to ban affirmative action AGDee News & Politics 73 11-14-2006 09:44 PM
judicial ruling to be secret? IowaStatePhiPsi News & Politics 11 09-08-2004 05:45 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.