Quote:
Originally Posted by Psi U MC Vito
The thing that gets me is the time period. For three weeks, it wouldn't be as noticeable. Why make a big deal about it? They could have even terminated her without making an announcement that she was a fornicator.
|
You have to look at it through their lens. It's not whether the transgression is an obvious one or not. It's whether the transgression was made. It violated her agreement and the trust the school and the parents put in her to be a moral example for their children. The fact that the school didn't sweep it under the rug because it could have been hidden actually reinforces the honesty of their opinions. Unless they've colluded to hide similar transgressions in the past they
appear to be fairly straightforward on the matter.
I don't know how the announcement was made, it could have been making an example of her, it could have been an announcement, answering a question, or a statement at a PTA/school board meeting that got filtered down to other parents and students, I don't know. So while it sounds like something went wrong there, I don't know what it was or whether I think it was so far out of line that I'd be suing too.
Hybrid Mode
