Quote:
Originally Posted by RU OX Alum
It just seems to correlate more. And I don't really like that which party is involved having much to do with it. That's what totalitarianists do. Combine offices and such.
|
Well the Westminster system is a pretty unique one. It evolved from an absolute monarchy, which would be a totalitarian regime, but with a democracy taking place over the centuries. Strictly speaking it is still an absolute monarchy in fact. Acts of Parliament can't pass without the approval of all three parts, including the Crown. And the cabinet are strictly speaking advisers to the Crown.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drolefille
Speaker is only in charge of one house, not of the government as a whole. President is nominally at least head of government but if he does not have a majority in the house/senate then he's not necessarily making policy either. Unlike the PM who is only the PM as long as his party is in the majority. So yes in some ways it works and some it doesn't. I just don't think it'd be as interesting to have Congress talking amongst themselves.
|
Yeah Official Questions just would not work here. However maybe it would work if during the State of the Union address or another joint session questions were asked of the big 3. And to pick a nit, the PM is PM as long as he supports a majority, doesn't have to be just his party as the current situation shows. Also there is no legal requirement for that, as the Queen still has the right to appoint whoever she wishes.
__________________
And he took a cup of coffee and gave thanks to God for it, saying, 'Each of you drink from it. This is my caffeine, which gives life.'