Quote:
Originally Posted by OHNOITSJESS
saving money or not it cost them a lot of student and alumni support as well as recruits.
guess who probably won't be going to football games her last semester (even though home games are covered in her tution)  |
Suit yourself. The guy's a semi-douche, multiple current players came out in support of the firing today (nicely offsetting the buddy-buddy "in support of.." letters from the weekend), and his "system" seems to have hit a plateau. It looks like last year was the outlier, and the Kliff Kingsbury era is the real ceiling of the program.
If that's what you want to throw your support and (parents') hard-earned dollar behind, I dig it. I just don't know that it's automatically right. I'm pretty sure locking a dude in a shed, regardless of whether he has been an entitled asshole in the past, would cost them recruits too - especially since he literally admitted it, then awkwardly tried to justify it.
This isn't 1952. You can't beat on kids, you can't be openly racist toward players, and you can't "make an example" of a kid by locking him in a closet. The culture has changed.
Threaded Mode
