Innocent bystander Derrion Albert killed

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by knight_shadow

I'm not naive enough to think that violence was non-existent during my upbringing. "Community policing" was widespread when I was growing up, though. There were several instances where fights were going to jump off, but parents and residents stepped in before things got out of control. Those kids were properly dealt with after the fact, too.

I agree that the internet and "NOW NOW NOW" media has contributed to our knowing about these incidents sooner, but (outside of LA/Chi gang issues) I don't remember hearing of this many truly disturbing events.

Right...this is all about the community efforts for your particular community and the fact that you don't "recall" hearing "this many" truly disturbing events in the news.

Not the same thing as kids today being off the wall and things being hugely different than they were when you were young.

[knight_shadow]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

Right...this is all about the community efforts for your particular community and the fact that you don't "recall" hearing "this many" truly disturbing events in the news.

Not the same thing as kids today being off the wall and things being hugely different than they were when you were young.

Multiple communities (I was a military brat, so I moved around a lot), but I see your point.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by knight_shadow

Multiple communities, but I see your point.

LOL...it could be 200 communities (although only 1% of those would have effective "community policing") and the point is still the same.

[knight_shadow]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

LOL...it could be 200 communities (although only 1% of those would have effective "community policing") and the point is still the same.

Many of the people that I interacted with (internet and IRL) shared similar stories. I know that we only represented a small-ish group, but I hear about things (violent and non-violent) MUCH more now.

But, again, I see your point

[agzg]

Originally Posted by OTW

They can spend billions of dollars to bring the Olympics to Chicago but they can't help the people struggling on the South Side?

I don't think the city of Chicago can afford to bring the Olympics here but that's another topic completely.

You're right, there are a lot of people struggling on the South Side, and it seems like no one is doing anything to help them.

[knight_shadow]

Originally Posted by OTW

On the CBS Early Morning Show, the lead story was President Obama going to Copenhagen to lobby for Chicago to host the 2016 Olympics.

And then they move on to the Derrion Albert story. WTF?

They can spend billions of dollars to bring the Olympics to Chicago but they can't help the people struggling on the South Side?

I heard about this earlier. I don't know why Obama is involved in this (hell, let this be a Michelle project).

Maybe they think the spillover benefits from the games will give the city some money to help those that are struggling? I don't know.

[agzg]

Originally Posted by knight_shadow

I heard about this earlier. I don't know why Obama is involved in this (hell, let this be a Michelle project).

Maybe they think the spillover benefits from the games will give the city some money to help those that are struggling? I don't know.

I don't think so, but you can call me a pessimist.

In some instances, it's going to push neighborhoods out and into other neighborhoods (when they build the various stadiums/housing for athletes/etc.) and that's going to cause more problems.

This is just my opinion, but these low income neighborhoods aren't going to be lifted up, they're going to be moved over, and then the city will ignore the same people, just in a different geographical area.

[epchick]

Originally Posted by agzg

I don't think so, but you can call me a pessimist.

In some instances, it's going to push neighborhoods out and into other neighborhoods (when they build the various stadiums/housing for athletes/etc.) and that's going to cause more problems.

This is just my opinion, but these low income neighborhoods aren't going to be lifted up, they're going to be moved over, and then the city will ignore the same people, just in a different geographical area.

I agree, and even if the area is left untouched for the Olympics, do you really think the city is gonna use it's revenues to help the South Side? I seriously doubt they would.

[knight_shadow]

Originally Posted by agzg

I don't think so, but you can call me a pessimist.

In some instances, it's going to push neighborhoods out and into other neighborhoods (when they build the various stadiums/housing for athletes/etc.) and that's going to cause more problems.

This is just my opinion, but these low income neighborhoods aren't going to be lifted up, they're going to be moved over, and then the city will ignore the same people, just in a different geographical area.

I won't call you a pessiment, because it's likely going to be the case.

All of the development will probably lead to (more) gentrification in the city, pushing the lower-class citizens farther out. I'm willing to bet money, though, that city leaders will use the argument to bring the games to the city.