Seriously, peeps. No one REALLY cares about your stupid rush story.

[Tippiechick]

Originally Posted by UGAalum94

Do you all still have the daily snark PM thing? Maybe it was a briefly lived thing in the era of ________ but perhaps it reduced the overall public snark to boringly low levels.

Yes, we still communicate. No, not daily. And, no to the second part. _________ ran a lot of fun people off with her stalking. I can think of several. And those people were fun people.

[KSUViolet06]

Originally Posted by Tippiechick

Yes, we still communicate. No, not daily. And, no to the second part. _________ ran a lot of fun people off with her stalking. I can think of several. And those people were fun people.

Yeah. It just got way too creepy for some people.

[AOII_LB93]

Originally Posted by KSUViolet06

Yeah. It just got way too creepy for some people.

And you know what else is creepy? Sorority shoppers who pretend that they are not....thank goodness that crap has slowed to a trickle.

[KSUViolet06]

Originally Posted by AOII_LB93

And you know what else is creepy? Sorority shoppers who pretend that they are not....thank goodness that crap has slowed to a trickle.

Yeah. People have started to figure out that guess what? No one can call you a "sorority shopper" if you're not posting about different sororities all over the internet.

[UGAalum94]

Originally Posted by Tippiechick

Yes, we still communicate. No, not daily. And, no to the second part. _________ ran a lot of fun people off with her stalking. I can think of several. And those people were fun people.

Yeah, up until that I wasn't sure who really had the crazy. I can understand deciding that exposing yourself to that level wasn't worth it.

[LikeOldTimes]

Originally Posted by Tippiechick

Yes, we still communicate. No, not daily. And, no to the second part. _________ ran a lot of fun people off with her stalking. I can think of several. And those people were fun people.

Now, now, let's not rewrite history, shall we? Remember it was YOU who started the stalking; posting pictures and websites of ____ on GC without permission.

But, you never were one to let the facts get in the way of a good story now, were you? So you started a whole smear campaign, and enlisted your little buddies to repeat your lies. And you're still doing it today.

Ah, but back to those days. You didn't like it, though, when ____ returned the favor and started looking you up on the internet too, did you? Sure it was OK when you were doing it to ______, but gawd forbid anyone did it back to you. After all, nobody ever dared to challenge "Queenie Tippie" before, and your nose is still out of joint over it. If it wasn't, then why do you keep bringing up ____?

So once again, to set the facts straight, Tippie started the stalking, was horrfied when someone did it back to her, and then ran around crying that somebody was stalking her.

Just keepin' you honest, and will continue to do so.

[texas*princess]

BAITY?

[DolphinChicaDDD]

Originally Posted by texas*princess

BAITY?

And I now heart this thread.

For the record, I've always hated rush threads. No. That is a lie. I've hated rush threads where every other post is, "wow I hope its green m&m's!!" followed by "no choose snickers!" For cryin out loud people, I wanted to read the poster's story, not how much you're dying for chocolate! And the retro threads have gotten waaaay out of hand.

But now this thread- its got it all. Complete with people who have returned from the great banned beyond.

Glad I couldn't sleep tonight! I might have missed all the good ol' fashion fun.

[AlphaFrog]

Originally Posted by DolphinChicaDDD

For the record, I've always hated rush threads. No. That is a lie. I've hated rush threads where every other post is, "wow I hope its green m&m's!!" followed by "no choose snickers!" For cryin out loud people, I wanted to read the poster's story, not how much you're dying for chocolate! And the retro threads have gotten waaaay out of hand.

This irritates me even in active rush threads....which is why I don't read them. If I could just read the story, without all the natter in there, I might.

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by texas*princess

BAITY?

Banned again already, and promptly after midnight.

I'm curious why her oft-banned friend (who probably told her that she was being discussed in this thread) still hasn't been banned in his latest incarnation after almost two months?

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

Banned again already, and promptly after midnight.

I'm curious why her oft-banned friend (who probably told her that she was being discussed in this thread) still hasn't been banned in his latest incarnation after almost two months?

I was wondering about that as well, as the alter-ego has lasted a lot longer than the others - perhaps there's been a peace offering with those who have the power to ban (i.e. a promise to behave and not post any more racist/bigoted/offensive content)?

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

Banned again already, and promptly after midnight.

I'm curious why her oft-banned friend (who probably told her that she was being discussed in this thread) still hasn't been banned in his latest incarnation after almost two months?

Because he is not really starting any mess and has yet to own up to being Earp.

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by DrPhil

Because he is not really starting any mess and has yet to own up to being Earp.

That's never mattered with previous bans.

Just curious.

[DrPhil]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

That's never mattered with previous bans.

Just curious.

True. I'm out of explanations then.


Maybe he donated a lot to the site.

[ThetaPrincess24]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

That's never mattered with previous bans.

Just curious.

I wonder the same thing.