GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 332,018
Threads: 115,728
Posts: 2,208,070
Welcome to our newest member, julilittle4847
» Online Users: 3,387
2 members and 3,385 guests
PGD-GRAD, Titchou
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-29-2009, 06:40 PM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
Well, as far as I understand it, all that the decision did today was say that it wasn't acceptable to, out of fear of a disparate outcome lawsuit, take an action that had a disparate outcome on a different racial group.
That's a pretty good nutshell based on my quick look at the opinion.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-29-2009, 07:44 PM
VandalSquirrel VandalSquirrel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,949
Something I haven't been able to find yet (I haven't looked very hard) is how it was certain or positive people were white or not. I thought that disclosing that information was optional, not required. I guess that every test taker could share that information, but that it was self disclosed if it was.

How did they know for certain if the test takers were white or not?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-29-2009, 08:52 PM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
Well, as far as I understand it, all that the decision did today was say that it wasn't acceptable to, out of fear of a disparate outcome lawsuit, take an action that had a disparate outcome on a different racial group.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat View Post
That's a pretty good nutshell based on my quick look at the opinion.
That's my understanding as well, based on my very quick reding of summaries of the opinion. This has been pretty big news in CT, so I'm going to try to read the opinion a bit further.

This has been a pretty big story in CT, and New Haven has had its share of problems over the years, so there will probably be quite a bit of talk about it locally.

There's probably also going to be a whole bunch out there as well about the fact that they're overruling Sotomayor (she was in the majority in the court of appeals decision).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
7 Big Cases to go before the Supreme Court soon PhiGam News & Politics 3 06-26-2008 10:59 AM
Supreme Court Justices kddani Greek Life 28 12-03-2004 09:56 PM
Supreme Court Tom Earp News & Politics 1 10-12-2004 06:09 PM
More Supreme Court Decisions AKAtude Alpha Kappa Alpha 6 07-01-2000 05:07 PM
Supreme Court Decision AKAtude Alpha Kappa Alpha 10 06-20-2000 04:22 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.