GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,510
Threads: 115,711
Posts: 2,207,650
Welcome to our newest member, aaidafrances842
» Online Users: 2,536
2 members and 2,534 guests
FSUZeta
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-29-2009, 05:26 PM
starang21 starang21 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: cobb
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
Their race was the main factor in the city's failure to promoted them. It's hard to see it otherwise.
not necessarily. their group wasn't turned down because they're white. they were turned down because there weren't more or any blacks or latinos. those 20 fire fighters would have been promoted had there been a some black or latino fire fighters. which doesn't hinge upon their whiteness.
__________________
my signature sucks

Last edited by starang21; 06-29-2009 at 05:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-29-2009, 05:31 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by starang21 View Post
not necessarily. their group wasn't turned down because they're white. they were turned down because there weren't more blacks or latinos. those 20 fire fighters would have been promoted had there been a some black or latino fire fighters. which doesn't hinge upon their whiteness.
But it does. Because the whiteness of the successful test takers is what prevented them from being black or Hispanic. [ETA: it's true that had others been among them, the issue wouldn't have shaken out like it did, but the fact that they didn't get promoted because they were white and not some other race remains.]

I'm not saying that the intent of the city was racial discrimination, but the effect of the decision had a disparate impact on whites.

I don't know that I go around fretting about reverse discrimination a lot, but most programs that involved the advancement of one group will frequently involved at least active disinterest in the success of other groups. It's hard to do this in a way that doesn't have an effect on one group or another.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-29-2009, 05:36 PM
DrPhil DrPhil is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14,733
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
Because the whiteness of the successful test takers is what prevented them from being black or Hispanic.
Is the glass half empty or half full? Ohhhhh...the conundrums of life.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
I don't know that I go around fretting about reverse discrimination a lot, but most programs that involved the advancement of one group will frequently involved at least active disinterest in the success of other groups. It's hard to do this in a way that doesn't have an effect on one group or another.
White people and especially white males need not fret about reverse discrimination. For every organization that gives a damn about equal opportunity based on race and gender, there are 10 that don't. Long live the status quo. Pip pip hooray!

Last edited by DrPhil; 06-29-2009 at 05:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-29-2009, 05:36 PM
starang21 starang21 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: cobb
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
But it does. Because the whiteness of the successful test takers is what prevented them from being black or Hispanic.

I'm not saying that the intent of the city was racial discrimination, but the effect of the decision had a disparate impact on whites.

I don't know that I go around fretting about reverse discrimination a lot, but most programs that involved the advancement of one group will frequently involved at least active disinterest in the success of other groups. It's hard to do this in a way that doesn't have an effect on one group or another.
lets say 25 people pass. 20 are white. 5 are nonwhite.

lets say 20 people pass. 20 are white. 0 are nonwhite.

tests are kept for the 1st case. tests are thrown out for the second. the tests are thrown out not because of the first number, but because of the second number. if the tests were thrown out because of they were white, both cases would result in the same outcome.

IMO.
__________________
my signature sucks
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-29-2009, 05:46 PM
starang21 starang21 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: cobb
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by starang21 View Post
lets say 25 people pass. 20 are white. 5 are nonwhite.

lets say 20 people pass. 20 are white. 0 are nonwhite.

tests are kept for the 1st case. tests are thrown out for the second. the tests are thrown out not because of the first number, but because of the second number. if the tests were thrown out because of they were white, both cases would result in the same outcome.

IMO.
wait, when i say first and second, i mean the # of white firefighters = first number, and # of nonwhite firefighters = second number.
__________________
my signature sucks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-29-2009, 06:25 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by starang21 View Post
wait, when i say first and second, i mean the # of white firefighters = first number, and # of nonwhite firefighters = second number.
I understand the point you're trying to make, I think, but the deal is that promotions were supposed to be based on achieving certain scores, not on the racial composition of the people achieving those scores.

It was after the fact that the city basically said, those of you who passed aren't non-white enough so we're canceling the promotions. It's not a theoretically pool, it was a group of specific people who faced this action because they were almost exclusively white.

In theory, as far as my opinion is concerned, if the city wanted to say we're only promoting based on results that yield at least this percentage of non-white qualifiers, maybe that'd be the way to go, since all applicants would have a vested interest in their own success and the success of whatever racial and ethnic groups the city wanted to advance.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
7 Big Cases to go before the Supreme Court soon PhiGam News & Politics 3 06-26-2008 10:59 AM
Supreme Court Justices kddani Greek Life 28 12-03-2004 09:56 PM
Supreme Court Tom Earp News & Politics 1 10-12-2004 06:09 PM
More Supreme Court Decisions AKAtude Alpha Kappa Alpha 6 07-01-2000 05:07 PM
Supreme Court Decision AKAtude Alpha Kappa Alpha 10 06-20-2000 04:22 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.