GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,510
Threads: 115,711
Posts: 2,207,649
Welcome to our newest member, aaidafrances842
» Online Users: 2,472
3 members and 2,469 guests
aaidafrances842, Cookiez17, LaneSig
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-25-2009, 11:40 AM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat View Post
Short version: Since Lawrence v Texas, in which the US Supreme Court struck down Texas's law criminalizing sodomy on the grounds that it violated constitutional privacy protections (ie, criminalizing acts of sexual intimacy between consenting adults), there has been speculation that a similar reasoning would invalidate laws criminalizing adultery. Civil laws of alienation of affection and divorce would presumably provide adequate recourse for the "non-offending" spouse without the need for the government to impose criminal punishment.

i think that may be generally true, but this case is a little different, I think. Sanford basically set up the media response by going AWOL. It was a story before the adultery part came out -- though as has been said, many of us guessed that it was coming. I still think the AWOL aspect is still the real public story, although it's not a juicy.
The issue seems different to me because of the assumptions involved in legal marriage. In Lawrence, you have only the issue of private sexual behavior. In adultery cases, you have behavior which, likely, violates a legal contract, depending on what we assume that marriage means.

(If adultery has long been a reason to file for divorce, it would seem to violate the idea of marriage. Even if the spouse engaging in the adultery consents, it would seem that the other spouse would have to as well for the issue to boil down to the same thing as Lawrence vs. Texas. )
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-25-2009, 11:44 AM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepimpact2 View Post
With respect to my statement about his wife, my statement was not intended to imply that she may not be hurt or that she isn't affected by the problems in her marriage. My point was that I couldn't likely see her being interested in suing his mistress.
Fair enough, I'd buy that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat View Post
Short version: Since Lawrence v Texas, in which the US Supreme Court struck down Texas's law criminalizing sodomy on the grounds that it violated constitutional privacy protections (ie, criminalizing acts of sexual intimacy between consenting adults), there has been speculation that a similar reasoning would invalidate laws criminalizing adultery. Civil laws of alienation of affection and divorce would presumably provide adequate recourse for the "non-offending" spouse without the need for the government to impose criminal punishment.
Exactly what I was referring to in my previous posts about Constitutionality, and probably shorter than what I would have posted. Thank you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
The issue seems different to me because of the assumptions involved in legal marriage. In Lawrence, you have only the issue of private sexual behavior. In adultery cases, you have behavior which, likely, violates a legal contract, depending on what we assume that marriage means.
How would it violate the legal contract of marriage, though?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-25-2009, 11:54 AM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid View Post



How would it violate the legal contract of marriage, though?
Isn't adultery still grounds for divorce in most states, or have we gone entirely no-fault in how we award divorces?

Sexual fidelity, it would seem to me, to be a default part of what you were agreeing to when you got married.

Marriage is weird when you start to think about it. What does it really mean these days other than receiving the state's blessing on your union, compelling your employer to offer whatever benefits it might offer, and filing taxes together?

How romantic.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2009, 11:56 AM
MysticCat MysticCat is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: A dark and very expensive forest
Posts: 12,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
The issue seems different to me because of the assumptions involved in legal marriage. In Lawrence, you have only the issue of private sexual behavior. In adultery cases, you have behavior which, likely, violates a legal contract, depending on what we assume that marriage means.
True, but I can't think of any other instance where breach (violation) of a contract is a criminal offense.

That's sort of where the rubber would hit the road: What is the state's legitimate interest in criminalizing conduct that otherwise may be protected by constitutional privacy rights? If a contract analysis is being applied, it is the non-breaching party who has the legitimate interest in seeking redress for the breach, not the government.

As for adultery vs. no-fault, in some states, you can't get alimony under no-fault. Adultery or some other fault will have to be shown if you're looking for anything beyond division of property or child support.
__________________
AMONG MEN HARMONY
1898

Last edited by MysticCat; 06-25-2009 at 12:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-25-2009, 12:04 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Thanks for your answers, guys!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Omega's New Governor!!!!!!!! blackbird Omega Psi Phi 2 11-21-2006 06:46 PM
NJ Governor resigns Rudey News & Politics 40 08-15-2004 08:00 PM
KD AI new Lousiana Governor! kddani Alumnae Initiation 3 11-18-2003 12:18 AM
New LA Governor a KD! aopirose Kappa Delta 1 11-17-2003 07:20 PM
Larry for CA governor!!! moe.ron News & Politics 0 08-05-2003 04:08 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.