Quote:
Originally Posted by a.e.B.O.T.
My opinion of Sotomayor will lie within in her response in defending her comment that a latino woman is more fit to make judgement than a white male.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepimpact2
I don't recall her actually saying that. It seems to me as if you are taking her words out of context and twisting them.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
She said it, but in context it doesn't seem like it's exactly what she meant. MC and others have quoted it earlier in the thread.
|
No, she didn't say that a Latina judge was "more fit." She said "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."
I think "more fit" somewhat skews that statement.
Reading the whole thing in context, it seems clear to me that the point she was trying to make was that while it's a laudable and proper goal for judges to set aside their personal biases when ruling, this cannot really be done completely, and successful attempts to do it can only come if the judge recognizes and acknowledges what his or her experiential biases are. I think she was also taking a stab at holding up white males as the standard by which to measure all other judges, as though white males are somehow exempt from experiential biases and as though the biases of judges who are not white males are measured by how they compare to the "non-biased" white males.
Everyone has biases based on experience, background, etc. You can't ingore them or set them aside to rule on the law unless you understand what they are to begin with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
|
No why didn't I think to link the whole speech when I posted the long excerpt in
post 21? Oh, wait . . . .
Threaded Mode
