Miss California USA posed topless

texas*princess · #1 05-05-2009, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle

Well, at least it's an unbiased "journalist" reporting!

I'm just saying what was on his site. There wasn't a mention of that on the NBC or thedirty.com article. Chillz!

SWTXBelle · #2 05-05-2009, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texas*princess

I'm just saying what was on his site. There wasn't a mention of that on the NBC or thedirty.com article. Chillz!

I'm chilled! Note use of smilie - sure sign of chilln' - and amusing pic!

I think the whole thing is funny on a couple of ironic levels.

deepimpact2 · #3 05-05-2009, 05:49 PM

I feel bad for her because she gave an honest answer. Perez Hilton basically said that's why she lost...because she wasn't politically correct. Which of course must mean that being politcally correct means lying when the situation calls for it.

In my opinion he lost credibility by calling her a stupid b$%^&.

agzg · #4 05-05-2009, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2

In my opinion he lost credibility by calling her a stupid b$%^&.

I'm sorry, I was unaware Perez Hilton had any credibility to start with.

BabyPiNK_FL · #5 05-05-2009, 06:38 PM

Perez Hilton is not the authority on why she lost. The person who won had been winning the whole time. He said that out of anger and to be mean. Her losing was not based solely on her answer (which for the 5th time I will point out did NOT answer the question Perez Hilton asked her to begin with!)

According to Perez, more NUDE pictures are on the way.

She sowed and now she's reapin', both the good-Christian film/commercial, and the bad- backlash from gay community and supporters. She appears to be trying to rise above it all, most likely her opening her fool mouth was the best thing that ever happened to her. We're still talking about her.

texas*princess · #6 05-05-2009, 06:57 PM

FWIW, PH wasn't the only judge who didn't like her answer.

And she didn't have to lie. It's possible to state your opinion in an eloquent way. She had absolutely no tact whatsoever. Her whole answer was basically word vomit.

And these pictures aren't magically surfacing because of her anti-gay tirade. There are many Miss --insert title here-- who had pictures from the past come back to haunt them.

I don't agree with the way PH responded to her (calling her names, etc) either, but that's not really the subject of this thread.

thedirty.com did say that they have more pictures that they will be publishing soon.

AKA_Monet · #7 05-05-2009, 07:07 PM

What's opposite marriage?

Seriously... If a girl wins Miss Cali, then wins Miss USA--there is a very high probability that she will be a major contender celebrity...

I have more to say... Let's just say that San Diego is NOT KNOWN to crank out too many Miss California's...

deepimpact2 · #8 05-05-2009, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texas*princess

FWIW, PH wasn't the only judge who didn't like her answer.

And she didn't have to lie. It's possible to state your opinion in an eloquent way. She had absolutely no tact whatsoever. Her whole answer was basically word vomit.

And these pictures aren't magically surfacing because of her anti-gay tirade. There are many Miss --insert title here-- who had pictures from the past come back to haunt them.

I don't agree with the way PH responded to her (calling her names, etc) either, but that's not really the subject of this thread.

thedirty.com did say that they have more pictures that they will be publishing soon.

I don't see where her response lacked tact.
I think she did the best she could considering her views on the subject. Essentially if you expect someone to get up there and say something people want to hear, but which goes against their own beliefs, that constitutes a lie. They weren't asking her to be tactful. No matter how she worded it, if she didn't say that she was in favor of gay marriage, it was going to be held against her. I'm basing this on what PH said when he was talking to Larry King.

Jimmy Choo · #9 05-05-2009, 08:19 PM

It's the "gay mafia".

And I'm glad!

Virtual Violet · #10 05-05-2009, 11:10 PM

Am I the only one who has had enough with this story?. While I think we all should "live and let live", I don't know why Perez Hilton and others who are in support of gay marriage has chosen to cruicify her for giving her opinion on a topic when she was asked about it DIRECTLY. Was she supposed to pander to those who asked the question or avoid the answer? It seems to be a bit much "punishment" for being truthful

This does not help the gay marriage "cause" one bit. They should tell Perez Hilton to sit down and take a pill!

deepimpact2 · #11 05-06-2009, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Virtual Violet

Am I the only one who has had enough with this story?. While I think we all should "live and let live", I don't know why Perez Hilton and others who are in support of gay marriage has chosen to cruicify her for giving her opinion on a topic when she was asked about it DIRECTLY. Was she supposed to pander to those who asked the question or avoid the answer? It seems to be a bit much "punishment" for being truthful

This does not help the gay marriage "cause" one bit. They should tell Perez Hilton to sit down and take a pill!

I have heard some theories that the reason she was asked the question and is being crucified like this is because of what happened with Proposition 8 out in California. I would not be surprised if that indeed turned out to be true. I haven't done any other research, but my understanding is that she was the only one who was asked this question and if that is true, I don't think it was a coincidence that SHE was the one asked.

As far as those who feel she didn't answer the question directly, I guess I don't see why people feel that way. I thought the question was how she felt about gay marriage or whether she supported it and she basically said no.

deepimpact2 · #12 05-05-2009, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by agzg

I'm sorry, I was unaware Perez Hilton had any credibility to start with.

I only mean credibility as far as his position concerning her response at the pageant. There were many people who agreed with him that she was wrong in giving the response that she did. My point was that he turned many of those people off when he started calling her names, especially since she appeared to be handling the situation in a more dignified manner.

agzg · #13 05-05-2009, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deepimpact2

I only mean credibility as far as his position concerning her response at the pageant. There were many people who agreed with him that she was wrong in giving the response that she did. My point was that he turned many of those people off when he started calling her names, especially since she appeared to be handling the situation in a more dignified manner.

What I'm saying is that I don't understand why Perez Hilton was a judge in the first place. Does it take a queen to spot a queen? They had to have known involving him in the show in any way was going to cause ridiculous drama, and the pageant has enough as it is. IDGI.

AKA_Monet · #14 05-05-2009, 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by agzg

What I'm saying is that I don't understand why Perez Hilton was a judge in the first place. Does it take a queen to spot a queen? They had to have known involving him in the show in any way was going to cause ridiculous drama, and the pageant has enough as it is. IDGI.

You are really wrong for that... LOL...

Welp, she doesn't have enough to Twerk on the Twerk Team...

deepimpact2 · #15 05-05-2009, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by agzg

What I'm saying is that I don't understand why Perez Hilton was a judge in the first place. Does it take a queen to spot a queen? They had to have known involving him in the show in any way was going to cause ridiculous drama, and the pageant has enough as it is. IDGI.

I feel the same way. I don't think he was a good choice to be a judge.

Love the part in bold. lmao