GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 330,855
Threads: 115,703
Posts: 2,207,328
Welcome to our newest member, zmasontivanvz58
» Online Users: 2,131
0 members and 2,131 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2009, 07:00 PM
KSigkid KSigkid is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 9,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC View Post
I don't know, it feels like a pretty sound breach of decorum to me - in any professional context in which I've met a celebrity, it would have been wildly inappropriate of me to ask for an autograph, particularly when "on the job." It's not about being "cold and lifeless" - it's about not being a dipshit when you're wearing a suit.
Agreed - there are certain positions and professions where you have to put aside some "normal" human reactions, and to me being a member of Congress is one of those places.

When you're a member of Congress, you may get into a situation where you have to run up against the President and his/her policies. It could be something as simple as overriding a veto, or it could be something as serious as an impeachment proceeding. Either way, I think it's the job of the Congressperson to make sure that there is nothing in their actions that would allude to any bias or favoritism in those situations.

If I knew that a sitting Congressperson had asked for the President's autograph, to me, it would bring up red flags.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-01-2009, 12:13 AM
nate2512 nate2512 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 804
Send a message via AIM to nate2512
Why wouldn't they just sit in their normal assigned seating?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-03-2009, 05:52 PM
PeppyGPhiB PeppyGPhiB is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Emerald City
Posts: 3,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by nate2512 View Post
Why wouldn't they just sit in their normal assigned seating?
I'm guessing because the Senate normally does not sit in that chamber.
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
Love. Labor. Learning. Loyalty.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2009, 06:31 PM
PhiGam PhiGam is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Potbelly's
Posts: 1,289
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-03-2009, 06:51 PM
PeppyGPhiB PeppyGPhiB is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Emerald City
Posts: 3,416
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhiGam View Post
Didn't IndyMac, WaMu, Lehman fail in September or October? To me, it just seems that Obama is in the right place at the wrong time.
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
Love. Labor. Learning. Loyalty.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-03-2009, 07:02 PM
PhiGam PhiGam is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Potbelly's
Posts: 1,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeppyGPhiB View Post
Didn't IndyMac, WaMu, Lehman fail in September or October? To me, it just seems that Obama is in the right place at the wrong time.
Every decision that he has made has led to even less investor confidence... namely the socialization of our banking system. He has already said that he's going to double the deficit THIS year. Investors do not like his policies at all, bottom line. The drop right after his election is undeniable.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-03-2009, 07:42 PM
UGAalum94 UGAalum94 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeppyGPhiB View Post
Didn't IndyMac, WaMu, Lehman fail in September or October? To me, it just seems that Obama is in the right place at the wrong time.
Or the wrong place at the wrong time depending on how you voted.

I tend to agree with you that Obama's being assigned blame for stuff that's mainly beyond his control and that some of the continuing economic drop is fall-out from policy, government activity, general failure to provide oversight, general willingness to regulate in the wrong way (take your pick) from before he was even in the Senate.

But, I don't think the stimulus bill was all that great and at some point when things don't start rebounding, Obama's going to own this one. (I'm oversimplifying by saying merely "stimulus bill". We could include all the proposed funding and regulation he's had a hand in as well and the strings attached to previous bailout funds that aren't proving popular.)

The fact that it's a Democratically controlled Congress with key long-term Democratic legislators who were players in some of the crisis areas, even when the Republicans were in control, might kind of at least double the pressure. There's no place to shift the blame in the public mind.

(I'm not really saying that I think Democrats are more responsible for the present situation, but at some point, especially considering everything that Bush was blamed for and the pattern that's established, the public is going to look to blame.)

Last edited by UGAalum94; 03-03-2009 at 07:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-03-2009, 08:38 PM
PhiGam PhiGam is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Potbelly's
Posts: 1,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94 View Post
Or the wrong place at the wrong time depending on how you voted.

I tend to agree with you that Obama's being assigned blame for stuff that's mainly beyond his control and that some of the continuing economic drop is fall-out from policy, government activity, general failure to provide oversight, general willingness to regulate in the wrong way (take your pick) from before he was even in the Senate.

But, I don't think the stimulus bill was all that great and at some point when things don't start rebounding, Obama's going to own this one. (I'm oversimplifying by saying merely "stimulus bill". We could include all the proposed funding and regulation he's had a hand in as well and the strings attached to previous bailout funds that aren't proving popular.)

The fact that it's a Democratically controlled Congress with key long-term Democratic legislators who were players in some of the crisis areas, even when the Republicans were in control, might kind of at least double the pressure. There's no place to shift the blame in the public mind.

(I'm not really saying that I think Democrats are more responsible for the present situation, but at some point, especially considering everything that Bush was blamed for and the pattern that's established, the public is going to look to blame.)
Admittedly, I'm really upset by the amount of unfair blame and criticism that President Bush received while in office. Perhaps thats why I am going to blame everything that happens for the next eight years on Barack Obama.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-03-2009, 08:42 AM
deepimpact2 deepimpact2 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid View Post
Agreed - there are certain positions and professions where you have to put aside some "normal" human reactions, and to me being a member of Congress is one of those places.

When you're a member of Congress, you may get into a situation where you have to run up against the President and his/her policies. It could be something as simple as overriding a veto, or it could be something as serious as an impeachment proceeding. Either way, I think it's the job of the Congressperson to make sure that there is nothing in their actions that would allude to any bias or favoritism in those situations.

If I knew that a sitting Congressperson had asked for the President's autograph, to me, it would bring up red flags.
I'm not clear on why it would send up a red flag. A red flag about what?

I think some members of Congress are able to refrain from showing bias or favoritism. Asking for an autograph has nothing to do with that.

I definitely don't think members of Congress should act like drooling tweens who just saw the Jonas brothers though.
__________________
Just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean I'm afraid of it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obama's New Deal No Better than Old One PhiGam News & Politics 0 10-29-2008 07:54 PM
American Rhetoric 1 Oh 1 DaemonSeid News & Politics 10 08-29-2008 09:37 PM
Obama's a Pimp? preciousjeni News & Politics 12 03-12-2008 12:07 AM
An Emerging Catastrophe Professor Alpha Phi Alpha 2 07-28-2004 10:22 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.