|
» GC Stats |
Members: 331,896
Threads: 115,724
Posts: 2,207,975
|
| Welcome to our newest member, MichaelBoush |
|
 |

02-20-2009, 12:35 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03
But, you're not borrowing directly from the government. You're taking loans out from a bank; in the event that you completely default (which is next to impossible since they garnish your wages and/or reduce your income tax refund if you don't pay), the government backs it up. Also, since loans can't be discharged in bankruptcy anymore, it's not as if people are shirking their responsibilities. In my mind, it's no different from a VA or FHA mortgage except you can't foreclose on it.
Oh, most people who go to private schools don't "mortgage their future," either, unless they're going to law or medical school.
|
What do you mean? Are you saying something about the scale of the loan or the connection to future employment? I just meant, in an offhand way, that one would take a huge financial obligation in the future for something that might provide little tangible reward in the present.
In terms of the loans, I think I knew that they are just federally insured rather than federal loans for the most part. (Do we have any straight federal loans, rather than grants, for low income students?)
Not having a tangible valuable asset changes the nature of the loan quite a bit from a VA or FHA mortgage to me, but I'm with you about how the loans pretty much stay with you forever. I'm not even sure you can default really. Wouldn't you almost have to be a position of drawing no income? I'm not at all concerned that people are ripping off the government or anything.
It's a safe risk for the government to take, but it's still kind of a strange one if you really start thinking about it. If they were tied to high income majors or degrees that were associated with delivering needed services it makes more sense than simply insuring loans regardless of institution or degree. And I say that as a big fan of the liberal arts.
I guess as someone noted earlier your taxable income goes up so it makes sense of that level, no matter what degree you earn.
|

02-23-2009, 04:01 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,261
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94
What do you mean? Are you saying something about the scale of the loan or the connection to future employment? I just meant, in an offhand way, that one would take a huge financial obligation in the future for something that might provide little tangible reward in the present.
|
What I meant was that with undergraduate loans, there is a cap on how much you can take out, to prevent someone with just a BA in Art History from going into serious debt. Those limits are much, much higher for graduate programs, and even higher for medical and law school loans because someone with a professional degree will have the ability to make more over their lifetime than a college graduate would.
|

02-23-2009, 09:15 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03
What I meant was that with undergraduate loans, there is a cap on how much you can take out, to prevent someone with just a BA in Art History from going into serious debt. Those limits are much, much higher for graduate programs, and even higher for medical and law school loans because someone with a professional degree will have the ability to make more over their lifetime than a college graduate would.
|
It's good to know. Do you have a sense of what the undergraduate cap is right now?
I thought you could get loans for the whole cost of undergraduate school and at some places if it's estimated to be 50,000 a year. . .
I'm probably not considering how much schools will typically give kids in scholarships and grants.
|

02-25-2009, 11:26 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,261
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94
It's good to know. Do you have a sense of what the undergraduate cap is right now?
I thought you could get loans for the whole cost of undergraduate school and at some places if it's estimated to be 50,000 a year. . .
I'm probably not considering how much schools will typically give kids in scholarships and grants.
|
I have no clue. But remember, the majority of the most expensive (and selective) schools do not give merit scholarships; at those places, financial assistance is based on actual need.
|

02-25-2009, 08:47 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Emerald City
Posts: 3,416
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Munchkin03
I have no clue. But remember, the majority of the most expensive (and selective) schools do not give merit scholarships; at those places, financial assistance is based on actual need.
|
Here's the deal with financial aid at most elite (but not Ivy) private schools. They do give merit scholarships, but very few of them. The point of merit aid is to attract the stars of the applicant pool, usually meaning students that are in a whole 'nother league versus the rest of the applicants. For example, a student who gets a perfect score on the ACT or SAT and has a 4.0 unweighted gpa will probably need an extra incentive to get him/her to actually attend Small State University, and money or a free ride is a great incentive. But many private schools have what's called a "self selected" applicant pool, meaning certain types of students tend to apply there - usually high achieving students - whereas other types won't bother. When everyone applying is in the top 10% of their high school class, with great test scores, and extracurriculars out the ears, there's only so much you can do to decide who is the cream of that crop. My school, if I recall, gave merit scholarships to the top 1% of the incoming freshmen, because, well, with so many excellent students, how are you supposed to separate the excellent from the more excellent? At a point it gets silly.
Instead, most private schools tend to give out need-based grants. They're conditional on family finances, but since private schools are so expensive, most students qualify for them. 75% of the students at my school were on financial aid. Since my school has a good endowment for its size, half of my tuition was covered immediately by grant aid from the school. Compare that to the $0 in grants I was offered from Univ. of Washington.
Then there are the loans. The first loans a financial office looks into on behalf of students (the purpose of filling out the FAFSA), are federal stafford loans. There is a maximum amount one can take out each year. Right now, the annual limit for first year is $3,500, $4,500 second year, and $5,500 for remaining years of undergraduate work. There are also federal Perkins loans, which are lended from the school. These federal loans are capped at low interest rates, and I was able to consolidate mine when I graduated to lock in my 3.0% interest rate. However, if you are still not able to pay your school fees with the grant and loan aid I've listed so far, you may qualify for private loans also offered through the financial aid office. These have higher interest rates (I have a small one with an interest rate of around 8%), and they are variable. There's no point in consolidating them because their interest rates cannot be locked in. And you're right, usually you can take these out for the remainder of what's needed for tuition, room & board, etc.
Most of the students today taking on the insane amounts of loan debt ($50k, $60k, $70k, etc.) have private loans - the worst kind. Stafford loans don't allow students to rack up that much in debt, only private loans can do that. And unfortunately, they're going to end up paying a ton of interest on those loans because of the rates. I am a big fan of a liberal arts core curriculum, and I believe education is one investment that will pay off, but I don't think I would (nor would my school) ever advise a student to take on $50,000 or more in private loan debt. When students are in college they have no idea how hard it will be for them to make those payments for many years after they've graduated.
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
Love. Labor. Learning. Loyalty.
Last edited by PeppyGPhiB; 02-25-2009 at 08:50 PM.
|

02-25-2009, 09:46 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 5,382
|
|
|
Thanks for all the info. It's interesting to think about.
I think that most of the student I know who are looking at colleges are from an income bracket where they won't seem to have that much need on paper for college generally, but, unless your parents have saved a ton of money for you, who can really afford 50,000 a year for an expensive private?
I'm sure the information they fill out reveals that though and then can pick up some grants and lower interest loans.
|

02-26-2009, 02:54 AM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Emerald City
Posts: 3,416
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94
Thanks for all the info. It's interesting to think about.
I think that most of the student I know who are looking at colleges are from an income bracket where they won't seem to have that much need on paper for college generally, but, unless your parents have saved a ton of money for you, who can really afford 50,000 a year for an expensive private?
I'm sure the information they fill out reveals that though and then can pick up some grants and lower interest loans.
|
This was certainly the case with the families of the kids I went to high school with (from a wealthy area), as well as some kids I went to college with. But like you said, while a state school may be very easily affordable for a couple, a private school tuition can be impossible for even a couple bringing in six figures. Therefore, "need" as determined by a private school will be much higher than need judged by a cheaper state school. Really when all was said and done, my expensive private school that I wanted really bad was only a few thousand more per year for me than my state school, because UW judged me to have no "need" financially (which is fair).
__________________
Gamma Phi Beta
Love. Labor. Learning. Loyalty.
|

02-26-2009, 12:58 PM
|
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,261
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94
Thanks for all the info. It's interesting to think about.
I think that most of the student I know who are looking at colleges are from an income bracket where they won't seem to have that much need on paper for college generally, but, unless your parents have saved a ton of money for you, who can really afford 50,000 a year for an expensive private?
I'm sure the information they fill out reveals that though and then can pick up some grants and lower interest loans.
|
A lot of people, it seems. At my undergrad, only about 40% of students received financial aid when I was there; most of that 40% were still middle to upper-middle class. That meant that 60% of students had parents or grandparents forking over the $35K a year. There were no merit scholarships--neither academic nor athletic.
Now, I think it's more 50/50, with more students who could be considered working or starting class.
There are definitely other schools where a lower percentage of students receive assistance, and tuition is about the same or higher.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|