Quote:
Originally Posted by preciousjeni
I'm having trouble understanding the uproar. What's the difference, in this specific case, between ending the baby's life while in the womb and ending the baby's life outside of the womb if the goal is accomplished?
|
That's a really good point. I think the uproar comes from the fact that the doctor didn't show up and someone with no medical expertise dealt with the situation and then just threw the baby out.
My belief is that abortions shouldn't be allowed after the point of when a baby can be delivered and have a possibility of living.
I posted earlier about a family friend who delivered prematurely. She delivered at 27 weeks, and that little girl is now 11 years old.
ETA: Also, the article didn't state why the woman was having an abortion. If she was having it because she didn't want the baby anymore, I have HUGE issues with that. If it was a matter of keeping the woman alive because of a difficult pregnancy, then I have a huge issue with the way it was carried out. Although, if it were the latter, I'd think it'd happen in a hospital and not an abortion clinic. (I know of a woman who had to abort mid-pregnancy because it was a chance of her dying and possibly the baby dying. She had other kids also. The abortion was very hard on everyone in their family and I believe they had a private funeral and the baby's body is buried in the cemetary.)
Threaded Mode
