Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
Are you talking specifically about the article posted above, or about any criticism of Obama or the Democrats?
|
It's really just a simplistic and hypocritical approach of "I'm happy so 'nuff said."
"I'm happy so 'nuff said" was never enough before this election and it isn't enough after this election.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
1) The concept of "moving on" would be brand new to this administration...I remember a lot of people not "moving on" during the last admininstration, and letting their views be known from the first day of Bush's presidency to the present day. For some people, "moving forward" means making their voices heard about things they disagree with in the new President's platform.
|
But the complainers are happy now. End of discussion. Stop being a hater.
The funniest thing is that we were discussing social dynamics beyond Obama's performance. If people think Obama's swearing in was powerful enough to errode the relevance of social dynamics then I fear this society is even more clueless than I thought it was.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSigkid
1)ETA: I find some of the changes in attitude on the board really interesting. Some of the people who were quick to criticize Bush from day one are advocating for full, unquestioned support for President Obama. Some of the people who were asking to give Bush more leeway are jumping all over the new President. It's not that any of this is a great shock, as it happens every time there is a change in the Presidency, especially when it goes from one party to another party. It's just interesting to see how people's visions of the Presidency change when the people filling the role change.
|
I notice that, too. Another reason why people need to stop being FANS of presidents and of political parties.
Hybrid Mode
