More Jackassery from Burress

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by KSigkid

I would only dispute this in the car accident case, because any car accident (even a rear-end collision) can be a traumatic experience. I haven't read anything about the seriousness of the accident, but the woman he hit may be dealing with some psychological (and possibly physical issues) if the collision was violent enough.

Of course, because of my job I'm usually someone who immediately sides with the defense-side of the argument, so take my statement for what you will...

As long as we're talking about negligence here, she's theoretically going to be made whole by the massive wad of cash she's going to extract from Mr. Burress before this is all over with, leaving him as the only remaining injured party... or at least that's my theory of the case, counselor

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by Kevin

As long as we're talking about negligence here, she's theoretically going to be made whole by the massive wad of cash she's going to extract from Mr. Burress before this is all over with, leaving him as the only remaining injured party... or at least that's my theory of the case, counselor

Fair enough, my future brother counsel. Again, I usually come at this stuff from the defense side anyway (and especially since I work for an insurance company's legal department), so my natural inclination is along the lines of what you're saying. My experience as a car accident victim, however, has colored my perception on these things.