Quote:
Originally Posted by CutiePie2000
Hmmm....after reading his bio, it's probably a good thing that Matty did not win.
"Matty Whitmore knows first-hand what it's like to have a lot and what's it's like to lose it all. At the age of 18, Whitmore inherited a trust fund from his grandparents, allowing him to live a comfortable life in paradise until partying it all away. Now at the age of 29, Whitmore wants the opportunity to find out what he's capable of doing on his own and believes SURVIVOR holds the answer."
|
I don't see why this is such a problem, though. If you deserve to win, you deserve to win. And I wouldn't necessarily hold something against someone if it happened 11 years ago... and when he was 18. Pretty sure there are a whole lot of people who would frivolously spend money if they were handed a large chunk of change at that age. He said he wanted to go on the show and earn the money, and I think that he worked hard.
IMO, Sugar was the most powerful when it came to strategy, Bob was the most powerful in terms of physical hardships and immunity challenges (surprisingly enough!) and Matty was most powerful in terms of the relationships he built. I think that any one of them would have deserved to win.. regardless of what's happened in their past.
Hybrid Mode
