Quote:
Originally Posted by awkward1
It was at the first hearings where only one CEO said that he would be willing to work for a dollar if he received a bailout, the other two stated that they would not. In fact, one CEO stated that he was quite comfortable where he was at and that he would not be willing to work for a dollar.
|
Yes, that is what I was talking about when I first posted the link. I think it was the Chrysler CEO who said he was happy where he was. Really if you are going to the gov't to ask for money to help bailout your company, but you won't give any (and saying your happy where you are is not giving anything), then why should the gov't help you?
My thing is, why do all 3 have to get bailed out? The gov't should look at which ones would benefit more from the money. Chrysler has the worst crash test ratings out of all the cars. If Chrysler went away, what's the big deal? You still have plenty of cars left. Ford & GMC (namely Chevy, Saturn and Pontiac) are the better sellers, they have the better crash test ratings, etc.
Threaded Mode
