Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94
I don't think that he earned or deserved what happened. I just don't think he should be able to hold someone else responsibly financially, especially to the tune of 3 millions dollars, for this.
I think we should go back to dueling pistols.
I also doubt some of the "facts" of the case and it colors my take no doubt. (What exactly did the manager promise? What did he actually do with the phone? Who really posted the photos and made the calls? Then, there's the question of how really damaging it was. The photos were up for 72 hours according to one report.)
One of my little hang ups in life is thinking that we try to make other people responsible for our errors too frequently. It seems like the guy's complaint on some level is that a third party failed to protect him from his own error and how someone else damaged him with his own error. It makes some sense to seek redress from the actual photo poster, but not from folks pretty far removed from the actual damaging acts.
|
Yeah - I mean, I'm just going off what we're reading here, and the actual facts may be completely different from what is in the complaint. No doubt about that.
Threaded Mode
