Quote:
Originally posted by DeltAlum
Max,
Read it again.
It said the second violation "within a five year period." That could mean it was two years -- or four -- or one. It would very likely mean that there are still some members who were there for the first violation.
And, by the way, James certainly doesn't need me to defend his positions, but I believe you've taken his comments out of context. In the posting I read he clearly said he wasn't advocating automatic and immediate expulsion, while perhaps understanding (not putting words in his mouth, I hope) that the liability problem is so serious that it might be necessary for that to happen in the strictest interpretation of the law.
|
DA..
I did not take James comments out of context. His exact statement was, "Expell members that drink underage. Immediately."
PS.. According the the SD Tribune article(3-3--02) just posted by SoCalGirl, the previous incident happened 5 years ago, not 2.
Threaded Mode