GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 332,033
Threads: 115,729
Posts: 2,208,094
Welcome to our newest member, znthantexaxdoz1
» Online Users: 2,534
0 members and 2,534 guests
No Members online
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2008, 10:58 PM
AGDee AGDee is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 15,854
Here's the part I don't understand. The guy who wants to bring the troops home as soon as possible is not supportive of them? But the guy who says we could be there for 50 years, is? I think that if I was a military mom or spouse, the thing I would want most is for my loved one to be home again, safe and sound. And that's not directed to Cindy McCain, it's everybody who says that wanting to get out of Iraq ASAP is not being supportive of the troops.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-14-2008, 12:23 PM
Nanners52674 Nanners52674 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 945
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGDee View Post
Here's the part I don't understand. The guy who wants to bring the troops home as soon as possible is not supportive of them? But the guy who says we could be there for 50 years, is? I think that if I was a military mom or spouse, the thing I would want most is for my loved one to be home again, safe and sound. And that's not directed to Cindy McCain, it's everybody who says that wanting to get out of Iraq ASAP is not being supportive of the troops.

Second that!!!!

My other issue with her statement which I forgot to mention was her suggestion that people come to see the troops who are deploying and to see their smiling faces and them cheering and being excited to go serve are country. In my experience and i know a decent amount of guys who have been over there none of them were smiling or cheering or excited. And if it was their 2nd or more tour and knew exactly what it was like there they were even less enthused.

I think the idea that their happy and excited going over there is a complete fallacy. The suicide rate of military members is up. I dont know if its up by 2 or 200 people, the point is IT'S UP.... That wouldn't be happening if troop moral was up.
__________________
*~*The Brotherhood of Man and the Alleviation of the World's Pain*~*
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-14-2008, 12:38 PM
ajuhdg ajuhdg is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: La-La-Land
Posts: 675
Send a message via Yahoo to ajuhdg
Coming directly from a former military spouse (myself), it is hard. Most of you know my story. (Pregnant two weeks before deployment, living in Germany, etc.) My husband was gone for 15 months. Yes, it was hard. We didn't struggle financially, because we had housing, COLA, healthcare. My husband was a SGT, so I think we were considered average. I now have two children, who are far too young to be military, but I can say that the ache for a child far surpasses that of a spouse. While my husband and I missed each other dearly while he was away, the 5 1/2 minutes that my son was away from us to have tubes put in his ears, was the longest, emptiest most fearful time of either of our lives. I can't imagine taking a person that I created, and having him in harms way without my constant supervision. The lack or abundance of money doesn't change how much you care for your children.

In the other argument, supporting the person who wants to remove troops vs. keeping them there. I have many current and former military members in my family. My nephew has experienced a great deal of PTSD, but he says that he'd drop everything and go back. My husband has said the same thing, he has said it's a waste for us to be there, but pulling out is not the right way to go either.

I just think in keeping with Obama's Senior Class President running speech, 'You want out of Iraq? Okay! Let's get outta there!' It's much more deep than just taking everyone out, and I don't really think that he's thought it through...as with most of his stances.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-14-2008, 12:56 PM
Munchkin03 Munchkin03 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Home.
Posts: 8,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajuhdg View Post
In the other argument, supporting the person who wants to remove troops vs. keeping them there. I have many current and former military members in my family. My nephew has experienced a great deal of PTSD, but he says that he'd drop everything and go back. My husband has said the same thing, he has said it's a waste for us to be there, but pulling out is not the right way to go either.
Most veterans I know really think we should stay the course. I admit I haven't spoken to as many veterans of the War on Terror, but the Vietnam era vets I am close to want us to get out of there in a way that we didn't back in the 70s. Vietnamization was kind of a joke, and then we just left all of Southeast Asia to collapse.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanners52674 View Post
I think the idea that their happy and excited going over there is a complete fallacy. The suicide rate of military members is up. I dont know if its up by 2 or 200 people, the point is IT'S UP.... That wouldn't be happening if troop moral was up.
Why you gotta bring morals into this, huh?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-14-2008, 01:55 PM
agzg agzg is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: but I am le tired...
Posts: 7,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajuhdg View Post
I just think in keeping with Obama's Senior Class President running speech, 'You want out of Iraq? Okay! Let's get outta there!' It's much more deep than just taking everyone out, and I don't really think that he's thought it through...as with most of his stances.
I agree that it's not so easy to pull out as Obama seems to think it is, but I also think that once he gets in and gets a fuller picture of what's going on in there, by being educated by the CJCS and his pick for SecDef, he's going to realize that we can't "just pull out." You're right - I don't think he's completely thought it through. Timelines are good, but they need to be extended timelines, allowing for multiple setbacks.

FWIW, al-Qa'ida wasn't very active in Iraq before we went in, but they've been pretty active there, now. If that's who we're really afraid of I think we have to engage them there, rather than engage them here.

Regardless, McCain has some weirmo ideas about Iraq, too, and other countries surrounding Iraq. I'd rather go with Obama (who I'm confident will change his plan in regard to Iraq/national security and whose domestic policies I like better) than McCain. Just my thoughts though.

What's funny is a lot of people I went to grad school with (I just finished my Master's Degree in Public and International Affairs, Security and Intelligence Studies in August) are feeling the same way. We were pretty outraged over the Guantanamo decision (not because it was a wrong one, just that it shouldn't have gone through SCOTUS), and were in line with McCain. As the election draws nearer, more and more of my classmates have jumped ship and decided to vote for Obama. These are intel/national security people, many of which are already working at various intelligence agencies and defense agencies in DC. FWIW.

Now I feel like I've just made a stump speech for Obama. Oops.

Last edited by agzg; 10-14-2008 at 01:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-14-2008, 02:13 PM
ajuhdg ajuhdg is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: La-La-Land
Posts: 675
Send a message via Yahoo to ajuhdg
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphagamzetagam View Post
FWIW, al-Qa'ida wasn't very active in Iraq before we went in, but they've been pretty active there, now. If that's who we're really afraid of I think we have to engage them there, rather than engage them here.
Were the active, and we just didn't know it? That's a tough judgement call. The middle east is much more under the microscope than before, so I'm not sure if that's a fair comparison. You are right on in saying keep them there, but they certainly seem to be drifting west!

When it comes to national security, I am much more in favor of someone who's 'been-there-done-that'. McCain has been living la military vida loca since conception. His plans for proceding are from firsthand seeing what works and what doesn't. It's not just this is what we'll tell people, and then I'll see what my people tell me. The impact of how that is handled has the potential to affect everyone more than just those with military in the fam. If this isn't done correctly, socialized medicine and abortion will be the least of our problems!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-14-2008, 01:20 PM
CrackerBarrel CrackerBarrel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In Mombasa, in a bar room drinking gin.
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanners52674 View Post
I think the idea that their happy and excited going over there is a complete fallacy. The suicide rate of military members is up. I dont know if its up by 2 or 200 people, the point is IT'S UP.... That wouldn't be happening if troop moral was up.
The troop suicide rate is still lower than that of the general population though. I also read an article suggesting that part of the reason is that the push for increased recruitment is bringing a lot of people in a prime socioeconomic demographic for suicide anyways (young people, often from a lower economic background) and that any time you have active combat duty then people are going to be exposed to stressful situations that may exasperate existing dispositions toward suicide.
__________________
"I put my mama on her, she threw her in the air. My mama said son, that's a mother buckin' mare."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-15-2008, 12:04 AM
Nanners52674 Nanners52674 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 945
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrackerBarrel View Post
The troop suicide rate is still lower than that of the general population though.
That's great that it's lower than another suicide rate. But guess what it's generally a bad thing for there to be a suicide rate in general. Yes it's unavoidable but it's not a positive statistic.

I don't care what suicide rate the military's is lower than. It could be lower than 400 other demographic groups rates. The POINT is that IT HAS GONE UP! If thats not a simple enough statement there are MORE suicides amongst military now than a year ago.

It should NOT matter who the group is or where their statistic measures up. What should matter is that its increased.

I don't understand how a person can argue that an increase in a suicide rate is NOT a bad or alarming thing????
__________________
*~*The Brotherhood of Man and the Alleviation of the World's Pain*~*
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-15-2008, 12:49 AM
CrackerBarrel CrackerBarrel is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: In Mombasa, in a bar room drinking gin.
Posts: 896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nanners52674 View Post
That's great that it's lower than another suicide rate. But guess what it's generally a bad thing for there to be a suicide rate in general. Yes it's unavoidable but it's not a positive statistic.

I don't care what suicide rate the military's is lower than. It could be lower than 400 other demographic groups rates. The POINT is that IT HAS GONE UP! If thats not a simple enough statement there are MORE suicides amongst military now than a year ago.

It should NOT matter who the group is or where their statistic measures up. What should matter is that its increased.

I don't understand how a person can argue that an increase in a suicide rate is NOT a bad or alarming thing????
It's bad, but not alarming. Because of a recruiting push, the army is increasingly made up of poorer young men, one of the most suicide prone groups in America. And maybe its just me, but it seems logical that any time the Army is fighting a war, the suicide rate is going to go up. It isn't that they are sad and want to come home because they don't support this war anymore, it's that in war you are going to see things that some peoples' minds can't easily handle that just might push them over the edge. I just don't see any other trend that would be logical.

The suicide rate has gone up because the Army is active now instead of just training and being ready. Guys who were at home are now half a world away. That will tend to be depressing. People who have never been exposed to carnage or had to kill someone before have now. That's depressing too. You wish it wouldn't happen, but the fact of the matter is that when the Army starts actually fighting, suicide rates are going to go up. It isn't because they are fighting an unpopular war or because the Army has low morale that it rose, it's because the very nature of actually fighting a war puts the brain under unique stresses that it's never had to handle before - and some people can't handle them on top of everything else going on in their lives.
__________________
"I put my mama on her, she threw her in the air. My mama said son, that's a mother buckin' mare."
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-15-2008, 08:46 AM
ajuhdg ajuhdg is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: La-La-Land
Posts: 675
Send a message via Yahoo to ajuhdg
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrackerBarrel View Post
It isn't that they are sad and want to come home because they don't support this war anymore, it's that in war you are going to see things that some peoples' minds can't easily handle that just might push them over the edge. I just don't see any other trend that would be logical.

The suicide rate has gone up because the Army is active now instead of just training and being ready. Guys who were at home are now half a world away. That will tend to be depressing. People who have never been exposed to carnage or had to kill someone before have now. That's depressing too. You wish it wouldn't happen, but the fact of the matter is that when the Army starts actually fighting, suicide rates are going to go up. It isn't because they are fighting an unpopular war or because the Army has low morale that it rose, it's because the very nature of actually fighting a war puts the brain under unique stresses that it's never had to handle before - and some people can't handle them on top of everything else going on in their lives.
EXACTLY! Everyone is able to handle stress in different ways. At the first deployment, morale was very high! There were several events leading up to them leaving. What I think people don't understand is when you join the military, you sign a contract. It is the same contract for ALL four branches. I tried to find a link, but don't have time to scour this morning. My husband and I read his over very thoroughly. There is a war clause. It basically says, 'If you are called to war, you will go.' It doesn't say, 'You get to decide if you want to go or not. And, if you go and you're not happy, we'll send you home.' I'm sure that most that sign it don't read it, and those that do kind of laughed when they got to that part. We (hubby) enlisted in January of 2001. I remember sitting on the side of the tub, and he said, "Well, it's not like we'll really even have another war!" I concurred, "Yeah, we're way to technologically advanced to let that happen again!" 10 months later....well...you know... The point is, you make a choice to serve, and you commit that if your commander-in-chief tells you to go, you go. It is the effing ARMY/NAVY/AIR FORCE/MARINE CORPS, what is the point if not to be preparing for defense.

Further, they are making major strides to help decompress these guys when they come back. There were several shrink sessions on the way home from deployment. Some of them were pretty dumb "How do you feel about the Iraqi people?" Anyone could easily lie their way through it. I think that's where a lot of the problems come. One person that we are aquainted with was attached to a very 'active' unit. He has since been released for severe PTSD. He calls freaking out, because he's hearing voices. However, he REFUSES to get help (which the Army pays for!) because he's too much of a man for it. Yeah, it sucks, but I have no sympathy. They are offering the tools, so help them help you. My hubby is not so severe, but I do try to get him together with one of the guys that he was deployed with periodically. His wife and I agree it helps them to let off some of the steam. THey'll talk to us, but it's easier with someone who's been there.

Just to Nanners, you're just trying to make it so cut and dry, and it's not. A lot of the soldiers who have killed themselves had much more going on...cheating wives, inability to get back into the swing of noncombat life (it took SEVERAL months for my husband to not slow down before driving under and overpass!)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cindy McCain ThetaPrincess24 Kappa Alpha Theta 7 02-07-2009 03:00 AM
Cindy McCain PhiGam News & Politics 19 06-01-2008 03:11 PM
Cindy Sheehan shinerbock News & Politics 14 10-28-2006 10:19 PM
cindy crawford scotty K Pi Beta Phi 4 11-20-2005 11:26 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.