Quote:
Originally Posted by 33girl
I'm going to play (I think) devil's advocate and say that if your nationals OKed a recruitment advisor (for a formal recruitment-having school) that had no training or experience in formal recruitment, then part of the stupid is definitely on them. These women need to be vetted to make sure they're right for the position, not just rubber stamped because another advisor OKs them or because they volunteered for it.
I take it none of y'all are actually alumnae of this particular chapter - that would be just another can of worms on top of the one that's already open.
It also sounds like Jenny may have been confused as to what your actual role is - whether you were "official" or whether you were just helping out because you happened to be there.
You def need a 3rd party's help with this - go to your district head or whatever it's called, or your volunteer coordinator, and clear everything up via email as to who is doing what because I think that's a big part of the problem here.
|
I think I need to clairfy something: The chapter had a good membership advisor ("GMA") that had attended the training this past summer and was very excited and had a good relationship with the chapter. However, Jenny did not like her ideas and always talked badly about her, calling her a "know it all" and "bossy". GMA finally had it with Jenny undermining her and quit her position in August. Jenny decided that a sister (from her originating chapter and good friend) who had never volunteered or been involved with any alumni stuff would be the new membership advisor. This is the girl who has never had any training or participated in formal recruitment.
Jenny knew I was just a volunteer. In her own nasty email she states clear as day that I am "just a volunteer".
Ya know, the more I write, the more I think Jenny just has serious control issues.
Threaded Mode
