Baggy Pants ban deemed 'unconstitutional'

[Kevin]

The article doesn't say why this law is unconstitutional. Does anyone know why the judge said the law was unconstitutional?

[SWTXBelle]

Because you have a constitutional right to bad taste.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle

Because you have a constitutional right to bad taste.

That depends

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by Kevin

The article doesn't say why this law is unconstitutional. Does anyone know why the judge said the law was unconstitutional?

The only story I've found on it was the AP report, and it didn't mention anything about the judge's basis.

[MysticCat]

I'm finding lots of local and wire reports on it, but none say why the judge ruled as he did. Many, though, do say that he found it to be unconstitutional "on the limited facts of this case," so I take that to mean he held that the ordinance was unconstitutionally applied in this case, not that it is unconstitutional on its face.

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

I'm finding lots of local and wire reports on it, but none say why the judge ruled as he did. Many, though, do say that he found it to be unconstitutional "on the limited facts of this case," so I take that to mean he held that the ordinance was unconstitutionally applied in this case, not that it is unconstitutional on its face.

Ok, that makes more sense.

[PANTHERTEKE]

About damn time.