ucla fall 2008 recruitment

[crazysassycool]

So this question is about UCLA specifically.. So I know most if not all incoming freshman have very impressive GPAs... and I understand that a lot of cuts during recruitment are based off of grades. What would be considered good/impressive for a second year at UCLA. I mean, I had over a 4.0 last year as a freshman but I have to admit college is a bit harder than highschool.. lol.. any insight would be great. Thanks!

[violetpretty]

Originally Posted by crazysassycool

So this question is about UCLA specifically.. So I know most if not all incoming freshman have very impressive GPAs... and I understand that a lot of cuts during recruitment are based off of grades. What would be considered good/impressive for a second year at UCLA. I mean, I had over a 4.0 last year as a freshman but I have to admit college is a bit harder than highschool.. lol.. any insight would be great. Thanks!

Really, every chapter will choose their members differently. I would guess that because UCLA is a very competitive school to get into, there would be fewer cuts based on grades than a school with a wider range of GPAs. I don't know, maybe chapters really do split hairs and only take girls with at or above a 3.9?

If you're a sophomore going through at UCLA and you have a 4.0 college GPA, that is fantastic. It's definitely one pitfall you have avoided as a sophomore. Wait, maybe I'm not reading this right...how can you have over a 4.0 in college? I've never heard of weighted GPAs in college. Does UCLA weight GPAs?

[crazysassycool]

Oh I apologize about the way i phrased that... What I meant was as an incoming freshman that was my GPA.. but since I am rushing this year as a second year, I no longer have that high of a GPA... now it's more like a B+ average. So, I was just wondering if that is considered good since I am in college and it is harder to get a 4.0 in college than it was in high school. Hope that made sense.