Quote:
Originally Posted by sigmadiva
Just as you feel that the Bible should be removed from this discussion, there are those who feel that it should be the sole basis for this discussion. And at that point, we have an impasse. I think we should understand that and move on.
For me, gay relationships period are not natural. You would you accept that non-Biblical answer?
I know we were on this merry-go-round like 15 pages back, but there is no benefit in nature to have a same sex relationship. No, I'm not talking about marriage or civil unions. I'm just talking about the fact that the female of the species mates with the male of the species to produce offspring.
|
I TOTALLY accept that as a non-Biblical answer because you did not cite the bible to make that answer or reference it, although there are biblical influences... so, thank you
So, on that basis, do you think that people who can not have children, should they be able to get married, i.e. people with medical conditions or women post-menopause? I am not trying to be a prick, but the basis of marriage for the purpose of having children denotes a lot of valid loving marriages out there that are man-and-woman.
Secondly, and at a less substantial point and more controversial point, a Gay marriage can provide a loving home and family for children who need it, no?
Threaded Mode
