Quote:
Originally Posted by shinerbock
Unfortunate, but not surprising.
This is what happens when judges decide what feels right and then seek to back that up with law.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SECdomination
California courts would pull a stunt like this. Civil unions aren't enough? Why do gays (and all their supporters) feel the need to change the definition of marriage?
Not to be a complete prick, but I don't know any gay people and I prefer not to engage them in morality debates. Could someone please explain the need for this? I honestly thought that civil unions accomplished the same thing.
You would be.
I won't disappoint though. In fact, I'm not sure how much I can participate in this thread for the sheer amount of nausea it's already causing me.
So where are the rest of you anti gay marriage folk?
|
"The decision was a bold surprise from a moderately conservative, Republican-dominated court that legal scholars have long dubbed "cautious," and experts said it was likely to influence other courts around the country."
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedi...,6169783.story
Threaded Mode
