GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > GLO Specific Forums > Alpha > Alpha Phi Omega
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 332,760
Threads: 115,738
Posts: 2,208,379
Welcome to our newest member, bryanandext8198
» Online Users: 2,873
0 members and 2,873 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-01-2008, 02:31 PM
KAPital PHINUst KAPital PHINUst is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 913
Quote:
Originally Posted by emb021 View Post
A tangental commment on this.

One thing that really annoys me with some Brothers is their rigid attitude toward change. I heard a lot of this in regards to recent proposals to change the Toast Song. The worse of this attitudes would be "I want APO to remain just the way it was when Frank Reed Horton founded it". This is just such a stupid attitude.

I love and respect history, and I love and respect the history of APO. But if there is ONE thing I've learned in my studies of our history is HOW MUCH WE HAVE CHANGED. I do not feel that these changes have altered our fundamental principles (tho there have, IMO, been attempts to do so). But there have been changes. Sadly, since so few Brothers have a decent understanding of our history, this attitude prevails. The history given in our Pledge Manual is just a high-level basics. And many chapters, IMO, emphasis their chapter history over national history such that their members have an even poorer understanding of it.

For instance. Our Toast Song did not come around until after H. Roe Bartle was our National President. How many realize this?

This is why I've been working on a series of presentations on APO history that I finally hope to present as a workshop at our next National Convention. Hopefully it will happen.
Speaking for myself only (though I am sure a number of brothers with these "rigid attitudes towards change" would agree with me to one extent or another), the reason why I am so resistant to all these changes is because it is turning APO from a service fraternity to a Circle K-ish greek letter service club. I didn't pledge a club, I pledged a fraternity.

And FWIW, being part of an all-male chapter intrinsically brought with it certain elements and traditions that gave APO the appearance, both in form and in substance of being a true-to-form fraternity rather than just a fraternity in structure, but a service club in form.

These changes IMHO are undermining the very essence of what Alpha Phi Omega was founded to do: to serve in a FRATERNAL bond. And I resent the notion that for this reason, my attitude is a so-called "stupid" one.
__________________
Diamonds Are Forever, and Nupes are For Your Eyes Only

KAY<>FNP
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
All Male Chapters AndrewPiChi Alpha Phi Omega 1 02-12-2008 07:32 PM
Holding back the train (proposals by the all-male chapters) naraht Alpha Phi Omega 9 02-19-2007 11:25 AM
All male chapters! JayBEE! Alpha Phi Omega 16 07-22-2004 12:14 PM
New Status brownsugakdphi Recruitment 1 05-30-2002 03:26 PM
All-Male APO chapters pirate00 Greek Life 4 04-26-2001 01:29 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.