Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAalum94
I think in the original context, rather than his restatements and explanations which you seem to be focusing on, Drolefille, Obama WAS explaining why this demographic wasn't likely to support him. So while I think Macallen is a little over the top on Obama generally, he's right about that part.
ETA: From the linked article: "Obama's comments came at the end of a lengthy answer in which he rejected the notion that voters were passing him over simply for racial reasons, saying instead that his campaign of hope and change was having difficulty in 'places where people feel most cynical about government.'"
And if you want to have people vote for you, shouldn't they be able to see clearly where you stand on some concrete issues, say for instance about trade. I was never really in the Obama camp, but he seems more and more like a typical politician with every passing day.
|
Yes, I see what you're saying.
The point still stands that he was saying that currently people are voting for an issue, not for someone they think will change the way things work because they don't think anyone will - hence the use of the term bitter. And ideally he'd like people to vote for someone, for him specifically, but in general as a shift in the political spectrum.
Threaded Mode
