Quote:
Originally Posted by Drolefille
That said I don't think it's disenfranchising anyone not to, it's not a constitutional right to vote in a primary. Either party could decide they want to nominate their candidate from within and *poof* it's done.
|
Just so I'm not misunderstood - I have
always been upset that I live in one of the last states to hold their primary, when tiny little Vermont and places like that make or break so many candidates. Come on, we have 187 delegates to their 23 delegates! I know that I'm far from the only person who feels somewhat disenfranchised by the lateness of our primary - which obviously spurred Michigan and Florida to push theirs up.
In a perfect world, there would be 5 Super Tuesdays, two weeks apart, with an equal amount of high and low delegates in each match. But it's never going to happen - or not in our lifetimes, anyway.
Another question: If they hold a new primary in Michigan and in Florida, what about the people who have died between January and the new primary?
Threaded Mode
