Politics 2008:The Caucuses and The Dem/Rep Conventions

[nittanyalum]

he specifically says the presidential campaign will NOT be planning the event in June in DC anymore, but he invites "others" to organize it (and he knows they're out there) and if his schedule allows, he'll try to attend. You must be listening selectively too.

And if you want to read his pandering for others to continue to drive money into his coffers for the continuation of his "revolution" as a serious bid for a presidential nomination, that's your delusion to grasp onto. He doesn't have to campaign for his congressional seat anymore, so why not keep his name out there through the efforts of others? Plus he's got that book coming out and he's starting up that PAC and Foundation. No such thing as bad publicity, right?

The man has only won 14 delegates. He may be turning down the lights on a dimmer, but the lights are going out.

[KAPital PHINUst]

Originally Posted by nittanyalum

he specifically says the presidential campaign will NOT be planning the event in June in DC anymore, but he invites "others" to organize it (and he knows they're out there) and if his schedule allows, he'll try to attend. You must be listening selectively too.

If I am listening selectively, explain how does the political campaign not planning the DC rally equate to Ron Paul dropping out? For the record, the DC rally was initiated by the grassroots a while back; it was never initiated by the campaign to begin with.

The man has only won 14 delegates. He may be turning down the lights on a dimmer, but the lights are going out.

Paul has won more delegates that that; and that does not include delegates from such caucus states as Nevada and Louisiana (which the final delegate numbers for the National Convention has not been determined as of yet). I was also told that Paul has potential for amassing a significant number of delegates in Alaska, Maine, and Washington (the state, not DC).