Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticCat
I agree. But it does pose an interesting question for strict constructionists.
|
Does it? Is there any precedent on this? I think even strict constructionists are going to have to practice a little Constitutional Divinity in order to sort this one out.
In the end, I can't see five justices saluting the idea that a person is not "natural born" for the purposes of this Article if they are born on a military installation located on foreign soil.
Threaded Mode
