Quote:
Originally Posted by Low C Sharp
The question is, did the new sorority coming on have anything to do with the established chapter beginning to struggle? I have a number of close friends who are alumni of the chapter that's having a rough time today. I got the impression that the community at Duke, for whatever reasons, likes to have a soccer-ball chapter to kick around, and the expansion wasn't the issue -- it was the departure/rejuvenation of the previous soccer-ball chapter. When the previous victim of negative stereotyping was gone, someone had to take its place.
|
This is exactly what I'm talking about. I think there is a similar discussion going on in another thread about one chapter always being the struggling chapter on a campus. I can also see what Zillini is saying and I do think there becomes a point when the struggling chapter crosses some sort of line and can no longer recover on campus (without closing then reopening or a complete recolonization).
I don't think that the new sorority necessarily caused this other chapter to fail, but when a chapter closes why wouldn't panhel want to wait a number of years and make sure all sororities are stabilized before trying to add a new group?
Maybe one way to look at a successful expansion is whether a higher percentage of the population is now going greek than were before. I think this addresses the niche violetpretty was talking about. At Duke, for example, the percentage of women going greek has actually declined even though the new sorority that came to campus did a fabulous job with their colonization! At a school like Ole Miss where there is more of a logistical issue with the size of the chapters, then the goal of expansion is to keep at least the same number of women involved in greek life but decrease each chapter's size, right?