30+ YO INTERESTED IN PLEDGING UNDERGRAD--IS THAT ABSURD?

[DSTCHAOS]

Originally Posted by OTW

If you read the important announcements in the individual NPHC sorority forums, you'll see that questions regarding membership are NOT answered online.

We could've and perhaps would've answered her very basic question. That's if she had used her 30+ yo brain and left that last paragraph out.

[1908Revelations]

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

We could've and perhaps would've answered her very basic question. That's if she had used her 30+ yo brain and left that last paragraph out.

Exactly! So not only do people want us to answer thier questions, but we HAVE to give them the responses they want.

[Senusret I]

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

We could've and perhaps would've answered her very basic question.

Just wanted to reiterate that it *could* have been answered by anyone who chose to do so because it was general, basic, and non-specific.

The members of the orgs know the rules and limitations on what they can and cannot discuss.

ETA: She was still wrong for framing her question with an attitude.

[DSTCHAOS]

Originally Posted by Senusret I

Just wanted to reiterate that it *could* have been answered by anyone who chose to do so because it was general, basic, and non-specific.

The members of the orgs know the rules and limitations on what they can and cannot discuss.

ETA: She was still wrong for framing her question with an attitude.

Yep. I was getting ready to answer her question until I read the end of her post.

If she's so concerned, she will read sources and contact local members and figure it out.

Perhaps she imagined that she was our elder or that we are all undergraduates. Even if she was and we were, the instructional tone she took with us needs to be checked before she approaches those undergraduates pretending like she's someone's momma.

[Benzgirl]

Tom, I wouldn't have answered her either based on her "attitude"