GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > General Chat Topics > News & Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,409
Threads: 115,706
Posts: 2,207,555
Welcome to our newest member, adavidtvanovo43
» Online Users: 6,636
2 members and 6,634 guests
Jamesrof, Orlandofal
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 12-13-2007, 09:05 PM
jon1856 jon1856 is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greater NorthEast
Posts: 3,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSig RC View Post
I clearly understood the acronym, and for you to insinuate otherwise is condescending and douchey.

I was telling you that your sentence did not make any degree of sense to me, because of what I intended in my post. Wires must have been crossed - and I'll explain below:



You're being too literal - I mean that her actual Senate record is sparse, spotty at best, and not indicative of any degree of involvement that would set her apart from Joe Average Senator (and in many ways, she comes in below par).

She doesn't have a good record in the Senate, even though she served - that was my point, not that it was some sort of awkward requisite for being President. Frankly, that final assertion would have been both asinine and literally wrong, so I'm not sure why you would think that was my point, but hey - my bad, I'll be more clear in the future.




What?

Just like you said, not every candidate has a similar Senate experience to draw from, so "side-by-side" comparisons are a joke - not to mention that individual candidates should be examined for their own merits, unless you think the goal should be to elect the "lesser evil" candidate. Comparison is a beautiful thing for finding differences between the candidates, but it is not at all necessary for rational discussion. Sorry - feel free to find Mike Huckabee's veto record as Governor, if you think it's comparable . . . I don't. Meanwhile, I think Hillary's "skeletons" include her overblown Senate experience - hence, I pointed out proof of that. Life is easy, brother.
The hazards and dangers of internet "conversation"
I think we are on same page.
I did a rather quick look at some of the other site and many of the records are just about equal to hers. However, as you pointed out, many other components to look at.

And as we are now finding out, many of the candidates have some sort of "skeleton" in their back ground.
Which does being it to, unfortunately, "the lesser of the evils" level. Or it at least adds that component to many of the
candidates

No one is perfect. While the US may have one of the better ways of electing officials, it too is not perfect.

Last edited by jon1856; 12-13-2007 at 09:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brother Ron Paul eli_the_chopper Lambda Chi Alpha 37 01-01-2009 01:15 PM
Sir Paul turns 64... DeltAlum Entertainment 4 06-16-2006 08:38 PM
Paul Van Dyk cashmoney Chit Chat 40 08-19-2005 04:58 PM
Paul Hamm cutiepatootie Entertainment 31 08-31-2004 11:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.