GreekChat.com Forums  

Go Back   GreekChat.com Forums > GLO Specific Forums > Pi > Pi Kappa Alpha
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

» GC Stats
Members: 331,774
Threads: 115,718
Posts: 2,207,855
Welcome to our newest member, zhalypittz4418
» Online Users: 3,617
0 members and 3,617 guests
No Members online
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 09-12-2007, 12:51 PM
NutBrnHair NutBrnHair is offline
GreekChat Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 7,487
Send a message via AIM to NutBrnHair
Quote:
Originally Posted by Firehouse View Post
The 1990s was a decade of lawyers. Liability was the big subject. The cover story for various national fraternities banning little sister groups was liability. They said having women under the umbrella of the fraternity's name would increase expose to insurance claims. There was also concern that such auxilleries might jeapordize the single-sex legal status of traditional fraternities and sororites.
I agree -- this is correct.

Quote:
I have my own theory. The little sister groups grew so large and so popular that existing sororities felt threatened. Fraternities on our campus used to hold "little sister rush". It cost a lot of money to join a sorority; there was very little cost at all in joining a little sister group.
On my campus, the top sororities do not take non-freshmen. If they do, it may be only one or two. We have a huge influx of junior college grads - fantastic women who would make wonderful sorority sisters - but they cannot get bids to the best houses because they are too old. They don't want to pay money to be part of a group that's a fixer-upper.

The sororities didn't like their monopoly taken away. Little Sisters had instant access to the best fraternities, and paid very little money. Better still, juniors were as welcome as freshmen. I've heard that sorority alumni lobbied their national offcies to push the fraternity national offices to ban little sisters. I'm not surprised that virtually all the fraternities took this action at about the same time. The traditrional sororities got their monopolies back. They won't expand the number of chapters on a campus, and thousands of junior girls are left out. But they're happy as ticks because they've got control of the social system. Little sisters threatened that control.
Let's see how I can say this nicely -- That is a bunch of hooey! (sp?)

Little Sister groups offered little or no lifetime experience and some viewed the groups as subservient to the men. I can't say I've ever heard any discussion that sororities felt "threatened" by these groups. 99% of the girls I knew who were little sisters back in the 80s were also members of sororities.
__________________
XΩ Alumna --45 Year member
ΦΑΘ Alumna
ΚΔΕ Alumna
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question about <> Sisters and "Real" Sisters Blue Violets Alpha Delta Pi 2 09-30-2003 11:56 AM
Y&R: TV sisters and sorority sisters, too CutiePie2000 Sigma Gamma Rho 3 07-09-2002 08:17 PM
Sisters defending pledges over sisters tamba Greek Life 29 11-09-2001 11:13 PM
Sisters Helping Sisters Find Work In Houston HoustonRecruiter Alumni Involvement 2 12-21-2000 11:14 AM
Sisters Helping Sisters In Houston HoustonRecruiter Greek Life 2 12-20-2000 05:57 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.