Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltAlum
Our GC attorney's need to chime in here, but I'd also guess that if the law firm doesn't already represent the GLO, there wouldn't be attorney/client privilege involved anyway.
|
I would think that the groups that agreed to participate in the program are considered to be clients of the firm. I'm no legal expert but that's what seems logical to me.
Also, I would think that I would
stongly discourage members of non participating groups to use that number at all. If there's not any kind of attorney privilege it could cause even more problems. I'm all for reporting hazing to the proper authorities. That number would not be "proper" for non participating groups.
Threaded Mode
