Too fat to recruit: or, DePauw, the Sequel

[33girl]

There are ways to "take one for the team" other than telling someone to not come to rush at all. From what I'm getting, the national consultant didn't even suggest kitchen duty or ask the women of the chapter what a good way to deal w/ this would be - she just said DON'T COME TO RUSH AT ALL.

And if this chapter IS ALREADY APPRECIABLY SMALLER THAN THE OTHERS, which apparently is the case, the rushees are going to notice that anyway. I'm sorry, but if anyone, national consultants or chapter officers or advisors, think the rushees won't notice this chapter has 80 girls while the other chapters have 200, they are too stupid to exist. That in and of itself is "different" enough to scare rushees away from the chapter, if we're operating on the principle that different = kiss of death.

Bottom line, if your chapter's numbers are a lot smaller than the other groups' to begin with, keeping the "image impaired" ladies away from rush isn't going to help your recruitment. You have to explain it in some way and it would be better to use your time thinking of a positive spin to put on that than figuring out who's skinny enough to rush and who is not.

[ΑΓΔSquirrelGirl]

Originally Posted by 33girl

There are ways to "take one for the team" other than telling someone to not come to rush at all. From what I'm getting, the national consultant didn't even suggest kitchen duty or ask the women of the chapter what a good way to deal w/ this would be - she just said DON'T COME TO RUSH AT ALL.

And if this chapter IS ALREADY APPRECIABLY SMALLER THAN THE OTHERS, which apparently is the case, the rushees are going to notice that anyway. I'm sorry, but if anyone, national consultants or chapter officers or advisors, think the rushees won't notice this chapter has 80 girls while the other chapters have 200, they are too stupid to exist. That in and of itself is "different" enough to scare rushees away from the chapter, if we're operating on the principle that different = kiss of death.

Bottom line, if your chapter's numbers are a lot smaller than the other groups' to begin with, keeping the "image impaired" ladies away from rush isn't going to help your recruitment. You have to explain it in some way and it would be better to use your time thinking of a positive spin to put on that than figuring out who's skinny enough to rush and who is not.

Great post.

I still fail to understand why after decades and decades of this no one will even lift one finger to change it...one person can't do it, but a lot could. Probably not drastically. And probably not even in ten years. But EVENTUALLY the Greek system could become something that those of us that have (and had at 18) a value system that doesn't involve judging someone on nothing but their appearance won't be ASHAMED of. Because let me tell you...it does embarass me to be lumped in with the SEC crowd. It's not one that I in general want to be associated with. I support the values of the founders, the ideals of the organizations...but I don't support the current atmosphere. At all. Because it, based on what I've seen and heard, does not mesh in any way with what the organizations were founded for.

[dgdramadawg]

Originally Posted by 33girl

And if this chapter IS ALREADY APPRECIABLY SMALLER THAN THE OTHERS, which apparently is the case, the rushees are going to notice that anyway. I'm sorry, but if anyone, national consultants or chapter officers or advisors, think the rushees won't notice this chapter has 80 girls while the other chapters have 200, they are too stupid to exist. That in and of itself is "different" enough to scare rushees away from the chapter, if we're operating on the principle that different = kiss of death.

Bottom line, if your chapter's numbers are a lot smaller than the other groups' to begin with, keeping the "image impaired" ladies away from rush isn't going to help your recruitment. You have to explain it in some way and it would be better to use your time thinking of a positive spin to put on that than figuring out who's skinny enough to rush and who is not.

You make a great point here. If the chapter has 100 as opposed to another chapter's 150, one missing member might not be a huge deal because the chapter isn't THAT much smaller. But what if the chapter does have 80 when the others have 200? At a lot of schools, in-the-know PNMs are probably going in planning to cut this house after round one anyway, so it probably wouldn't help or hurt to have this member rushing people.

[AlphaFrog]

I'm surprised in the PC-ness that NPC is becoming, they don't make a rule that all sororities can only have as many rushers on the floor as the number of members of the smallest chapter on campus. That way PNMs aren't judging on size.

I think it would be going completely PC-overboard, but I can't say that I don't eventually see it happening.

[33girl]

Originally Posted by AlphaFrog

I'm surprised in the PC-ness that NPC is becoming, they don't make a rule that all sororities can only have as many rushers on the floor as the number of members of the smallest chapter on campus. That way PNMs aren't judging on size.

I think it would be going completely PC-overboard, but I can't say that I don't eventually see it happening.

Some schools already do this for activity days or the first Meet the Greeks type round - you can only have 15 or however many sisters at the table. Obviously, though, once you go to the next round you realize who has 20 and who has 95.

Unless you mean doing it for all of rush, and (depending on the group's voting rules) that might go against some groups' bylaws. That is - if everyone can only have 20 members rushing cause that's the size of the smallest chapter, the larger ones might only have 1/4 of their members who have met the PNMs. Either they wouldn't be able to vote anyone in or PNMs would have to be voted on sight unseen.

Yikes. Talk about a cluster#$%k.

[dgdramadawg]

Originally Posted by SECdomination

Haha, I'm definately NOT a woman. I just noticed how popular this thread was and thought I'd better tell it how it is. Besides, would a woman really write that?

Haha, we just figured only a girl would understand.

[Tom Earp]

Originally Posted by dgdramadawg

Haha, we just figured only a girl would understand.

Maybe that is the problem, High I am a Barbi and I should fit!


Or not!

Maybe small minds fit?

[dgdramadawg]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

Maybe that is the problem, High I am a Barbi and I should fit!

Or not!

Maybe small minds fit?

It's hard for people from outside a system to understand why it works the way it works. Since SECdomination really seems to get it and a lot of guys don't (because fraternity rush is so different), SydneyK and I assumed he was a chick. But I'm guessing he has a lot of friends in sororities and just has a good understanding of how things work in our recruitment.

Does this answer what you're asking? Your post makes very little sense.

[FSUZeta]

folks, it is not just in recruitment. i distinctly remember reading an aol story a year or two ago that showed statistics on how overweight people are discriminated against in both hirings and promotions.

[Low C Sharp]

You're saying that your friends wanted to be pi chis because they just can't stand being at selection meetings any more?

Or are you saying that their chapters wanted them to be pi chis because they were fighting with the rest of the chapter at selection time?
________
TorrieLynn cam

[carnation]

Originally Posted by SECdomination

A couple of my good friends (from top chapters, mind you) are going to be Pi Chis (Rho Gammas?) this year. I asked why, and I got a very long lesson on the ins and outs of sorority rush.
Apparantly, the bid meetings are brutal and end with many crying girls threating to quit...

Oh, I hear that all the time, especially that seniors fight to be counselors.