Why do multicultural GLOs/organizations exist?

[MsDGP007]

Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest

I just want to state for the record that I don't personally have a problem with anyone joining the org of their choice...no matter what it is. What bothers me is when someone says that they didn't feel that the NPHC orgs fit them when they did very little research (if any) regarding our orgs. Some people will come to this conclusion after their encounter with only one of our orgs or possibly because of hearsay, rumor, or bad press. If you are truly interested in gaining knowledge about us, then do some "real" research...on your own. I would respect a person more if they just said I chose ABC because I liked it...or because I wanted to...period...no explanation needed. There is no need to act like you did any extensive research that would lead you to conclude that the NPHC orgs were not for you. I'm one of those people who likes what I like and I don't feel a need to justify anything to anyone. But there are those that THINK they know what we're all about today because they've observed an undergrad chapter or two that didn't align with our missions or they heard this or that through the grapes. All I have to say to that is...we have a lot of undergrad and graduate chapters and a whole lot of members and I truly believe that MOST of us are doing great things in our communities, things that don't end up in the press and that people don't spread rumors about. If you want to do the research, then really do it and if you don't care to, that's okay to.

I'm sorry, but I really don't follow where you are coming from. Not to be smart or anything...I'm just confused. What's wrong with saying that NPHC orgs don't fit you? I mean...there were only two facets through which to see any of those organizations as an outsider and that's 1) The National website, or press, etc. and 2) the local chapter...if there was one. I went to a school were there was only Zeta Phi Beta and Delta Sigma Theta (AKA was there...but inactive or not allowed to rush...something like that). DST was sort of familiar to me because some of my friends from HS pledged...but the DST chapter was not too visable at my school. I only saw them at general NPHC events...not with their own events. ZPB was more so....but still...it was only a few girls...maybe 7 active sorors. Being that the NPHC wasn't really jumping at my school...I would need to turn to the national history to see what they were all about...because I would feel I would be pledging something much bigger than what I see in front of me. But the history of NPHCs don't really feel like something I can align myself into. Besides, as a collegian, don't you have to pledge your school's chapter? So why research other chapters...unless you want to pledge as a alumna....or you're thinking about transferring? Even so, I think it would be tough if you truly desire to be in such-and-such org one day, but you decide to sit out 4 years because you aren't feeling your local chapter. I don't know...that's just me. Maybe it happens more often than I think.

Also, who researches anything if at first they don't find it interesting or befitting? That's sort of like calling out someone for not buying a certain car...because although it's fast and popular...your head bumps the ceiling when you sit in it.

[rhoyaltempest]

Originally Posted by MsDGP007

I'm sorry, but I really don't follow where you are coming from. Not to be smart or anything...I'm just confused. What's wrong with saying that NPHC orgs don't fit you? I mean...there were only two facets through which to see any of those organizations as an outsider and that's 1) The National website, or press, etc. and 2) the local chapter...if there was one. I went to a school were there was only Zeta Phi Beta and Delta Sigma Theta (AKA was there...but inactive or not allowed to rush...something like that). DST was sort of familiar to me because some of my friends from HS pledged...but the DST chapter was not too visable at my school. I only saw them at general NPHC events...not with their own events. ZPB was more so....but still...it was only a few girls...maybe 7 active sorors. Being that the NPHC wasn't really jumping at my school...I would need to turn to the national history to see what they were all about...because I would feel I would be pledging something much bigger than what I see in front of me. But the history of NPHCs don't really feel like something I can align myself into. Besides, as a collegian, don't you have to pledge your school's chapter? So why research other chapters...unless you want to pledge as a alumna....or you're thinking about transferring? Even so, I think it would be tough if you truly desire to be in such-and-such org one day, but you decide to sit out 4 years because you aren't feeling your local chapter. I don't know...that's just me. Maybe it happens more often than I think.

Also, who researches anything if at first they don't find it interesting or befitting? That's sort of like calling out someone for not buying a certain car...because although it's fast and popular...your head bumps the ceiling when you sit in it.

I understand what you're saying but undergrad is only part of it. The real work begins after college, when you join a grad chapter. For most people, this will be their chapter for the rest of their lives and grad chapter is on a different level entirely. Some people have researched our orgs and fell in love with not only our history, but with what we are doing right now from a National perspective so they decided to charter a chapter if there wasn't one or wait and go grad. And like I said before...you don't have to do any research if you don't want to but don't act like you have...and I'm not talking to you specifically.

[Little32]

I joined AKA because of what I saw in AKA, not because of what I did not see in other organizations, and that is the only way that I would talk about my reasons for choosing my sorority. I would not frame my choice as a rejection of what I saw in other organizations, but as an embracing of what I saw in AKA.

[rhoyaltempest]

Originally Posted by Little32

I joined AKA because of what I saw in AKA, not because of what I did not see in other organizations, and that is the only way that I would talk about my reasons for choosing my sorority. I would not frame my choice as a rejection of what I saw in other organizations, but as an embracing of what I saw in AKA.

I totally agree with you on this. That is exactly why I chose SGRho.

[mccoyred]

Originally Posted by Little32

I joined AKA because of what I saw in AKA, not because of what I did not see in other organizations...

This SHOULD be why someone chooses their org. We don't have to tear others down to lift ourselves (or our org of choice) up; doing so demonstrates lack of character.