Steakhouse refuses to serve OJ Simpson

[deeznutz]

Question.How come when a person makes a comment and then people post such things that may go against their true belief of the situation, they want to start pulling little PETTY STUFF OUT THEIR FACE???????Like commenting on grammer skills(like their Ms.Crabtree from the Little rascles)the and making suggestions about what bible 2 read(like they joyce meyer or joel osteen),and then start asking REAL DUMB AZZ QUESTIONS LIKE DO I HAVE ANGRY SEX?????come on really, What the **** does that have to do with anything??????

And 4 the record yeah I know that I can set the signiture option on...but hey where would the fun be in that??????beause this BOARD HAS ITS OWN GRAMMER & SPELLING POLICE!!!!oh my gosh..I better run I hear the alarm
...ooooh my goodnesss theysss comez to take me away to da big ol house...Izz sorry Izzz wont doze it again.....

[moe.ron]

Oj didn't kill Nicole. Damn the man for putting OJ down, damn the man.

We're with you OJ, the Juice is Loose.

[AKA_Monet]

Originally Posted by PM_Mama00

1. What's a "true 'hood"?

B. What is a Flow-Dah?

IV. Who are "they"?

Are you worry that you my be one of "them"?

[Senusret I]

I don't understand why a restaurant gets to arbitrarily refuse service.

[Drolefille]

Originally Posted by Senusret I

I don't understand why a restaurant gets to arbitrarily refuse service.

They have the right to refuse service to anyone as long as it isn't because they're a member of a protected group. So refusing OJ because he doesn't like the guy is OK, refusing him because he's Black would not be.

I think he's incredibly scummy for taking a dozen people out to dinner instead of paying money that he owes in a civil suit. Even if he wasn't paying for their dinner, his was a contribution that he could have been paying.

Oh yeah and that whole "If I Did It, which I didn't, this is how the evidence would show that I did it, if I did, which I didn't, but I could have, but don't worry I didn't, please pay me more money that I'll hide from those I rightfully, legally owe." I'm not sure how that fit on the cover.

[UGAalum94]

Originally Posted by Senusret I

I don't understand why a restaurant gets to arbitrarily refuse service.

Do you think it was really arbitrary?


Sure if they served Robert Blake and refused OJ, we'd have something to talk about, maybe.

Oh, and I'm cool with refusing service to the people who were on the wrong side of the civil rights movement, too, if that somehow has anything to do with this.

[RU OX Alum]

Originally Posted by Senusret I

I don't understand why a restaurant gets to arbitrarily refuse service.

usually state law protects business' rights to refuse service

for instance, if I think someone is shoplifting, like if they pay for something small after browsing for three hours and then the alarm goes beep and they run out of the store...and then come back the next day (like a dumbass) they don't get to come in. You don't have the right to go anywhere you like just because it's there.

for a restaurant situation: OJ might be dangerous. Management had to think of the safety of their other customers and also their reputation, since service industry establishments (bars, resturants, etc.) mostly are either successful or failure-ful based on word of mouth, sometimes only word of mouth.

I mean, you can be turned down from a nightclub if you are not dressed the way that night club wants people inside to be dressed, so why not be turned down from a restaurant where they think you might kill someone or might have in the past?

Long post made short now: it wasn't OJ's restuarant, so OJ had no guarteed right to be there. He only has a right to be there and conduct business with that establishment if either he: A-owns said establishment or B-is welcomed by the people running that business. He wasn't. So he had to leave.

[JonInKC]

Originally Posted by PM_Mama00

1. What's a "true 'hood"?

A true hood doesn't tolerate sucker MCs.