Mississippi Supreme Court case.

[ladygreek]

Originally Posted by TheFratBoyNews

Well perhaps if these three gents were officers of the fraternity, the chapter should be suspended. However, I doubt it, officers tend to have better judgment than these three.

Not necessarily.

[Tom Earp]

What was not forth coming about the situation?

They used a weapon that is felony! They shot and killed someone! How hard is that to understand stupidity?

They should be placed in prison and Judged by thier peers and if they did this found guilty and delt with at the highest level!

Spit on a monument and lose a life!

What is wrong with this picture?

Banned is not enough!

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

They used a weapon that is felony! They shot and killed someone! How hard is that to understand stupidity? . . .

Spit on a monument and lose a life!

What is wrong with this picture?

Your description of it is what's wrong with the picture, since none of what you said actually happened.

Three members of the chapter assualted someone because he spat on an Omega momument. The "spitter" shot and wounded one of the Omegas -- or at least his gun went off during the altercation and wounded one of the Omegas. No one was killed, the three Omegas didn't have the gun and it was one of the Omegas, not the "spitter," who was wounded.

[mccoyred]

Reading



Is




Fundamental.

Originally Posted by Tom Earp

What was not forth coming about the situation?

They used a weapon that is felony! They shot and killed someone! How hard is that to understand stupidity?

They should be placed in prison and Judged by thier peers and if they did this found guilty and delt with at the highest level!

Spit on a monument and lose a life!

What is wrong with this picture?

Banned is not enough!