I really don't understand why it's fashionable to have pictures of 3 of your sisters holding you up for a keg stand while you're wearing a torn up shirt posted online. As such, I have no such pictures available for public viewing and would hope that none of my sisters do either. The whole "no curse words in a group name rule" is a little far to me. Actually having anyone tell you what you can and cannot have posted for a select group of your friends (profile set as private) is a bit far to me. I understand WHY individual groups feel the need to regulate this, many members do NOT have their profiles private, and that is exactly who should be in charge of setting the rules. In this federalism case, I don't think Panhel should be the ones taking charge of this. They can make suggestions sure, but I think the monitoring should be up to the chapters. I know in Zeta's latest newsletter issue there's a HUGE article on what is not appropriate to have online (
http://www.zetataualpha.org/content/.../winter07.pdf). Hot button issue. And, as someone above me mentioned, what's to keep one bitter girl (or a even few) on Panhel from completely targeting out another group she isn't particularly fond of? There should be guidelines, but you can't expect a couple of collegiates to create and enforce them equally.
P.S. Everyone come join my new facebook group "I love taking rips off of beer bongs in my letters while my butt is hanging out of my skirt and posting pictures of it all later, bitch."
Threaded Mode
