Quote:
Originally Posted by EE-BO
It is impossible for me to provide the "other side" of the issue as I was not involved directly in any way.
|
I must disagree with you here. You can do anything you want if you apply yourself.
The fact that you are not directly involved with the situation coupled with your desire to see other issues handled in a more appropriate manner make you a highly qualified individual to share an objective report on the entire issue.
For what I have been ablet o read in the lbogs and here is that some brothers who did not live in the chapter house (reason not given) opted to rent a place to live. The fact that it near the chapter house and owned by a Beta Alum should have nothing to do with this. Then some activities took place at this "annex" that probably should not have.
Now, what is still confusing is the early converstation with the Advisors on this "annex." Since the Chapter and GF/AO have not published the minutes of the meetings, we do not know if they discussed this as a way to get around the dry rules or if they group that did get the "annex" announced they would be living there because they can not get a room in the chapter house.
If the chapter did discuss in official meetings ways to get around the dry house then it is possible that this reorganization is OK.
Maybe things regarding the GF/AO handling of the reorg could have been better. Maybe the Chapter Advisorory team should have been a little more determined in their efforts to get the chapter to operate better.
Just one brother's opinion from the outside looking in.
Threaded Mode
