FDA poised to OK food from cloned animals

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by blueangel

Google what? You have not quoted a single retort. Instead, you have given me a list of research papers to read. And, in your next post, you once again go into a diatribe about HOW an animal is cloned. I know how it is done. "How" it is performed was never in question. [Followed by a ridiculously long post that I don't have an hour to waste on and wouldn't read even if I did.]

Please, please, please stop playing with matches.

[blueangel]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

Please, please, please stop playing with matches.

In other words, you can't retort any of my facts either!

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by blueangel

In other words, you can't retort any of my facts either!

We've been through this before, but I'll try again, just one more time.

I don't care about any of your "facts" and I'm not trying to "retort" them. I leave that to people like AKAMonet, who has established her expertise and credibility in the subject and whose opinion, unlike your's, I respect. I just get very, very tired of what you seem to think passes as intelligent discussion.

I would have to take your posts seriously in order to try and "retort your facts."

[blueangel]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

We've been through this before, but I'll try again, just one more time.

I don't care about any of your "facts" and I'm not trying to "retort" them. I leave that to people like AKAMonet, who has established her expertise and credibility in the subject and whose opinion, unlike your's, I respect. I just get very, very tired of what you seem to think passes as intelligent discussion.

I would have to take your posts seriously in order to try and "retort your facts."

So then, why are you posting in this discussion if you're not going to discuss the topic?

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by blueangel

So then, why are you posting in this discussion if you're not going to discuss the topic?

Read carefully.

I didn't say I wasn't going to discuss the topic. I said I wasn't going to discuss it with you, or more precisely, I wasn't going to waste my time trying to respond to the merits, and I use that term as loosely and broadly as possible, of your "arguments."

As far as your arguments go, I can only try to warn others of the futility involved in trying to carry on a discussion like this with you.

[blueangel]

Originally Posted by MysticCat

Read carefully.

I didn't say I wasn't going to discuss the topic. I said I wasn't going to discuss it with you, or more precisely, I wasn't going to waste my time trying to respond to the merits, and I use that term as loosely and broadly as possible, of your "arguments."

As far as your arguments go, I can only try to warn others of the futility involved in trying to carry on a discussion like this with you.

Read carefully:

Ah, I see, so the "futility involved in trying to carry on a discussion like this" is because you don't have the facts to retort mine.

Or maybe this whole line of off-topic banter is to try to bury my post to Monet to try to take the off her-- as she STILL hasn't been able to dispute a simple fact I posted.

[MysticCat]

Originally Posted by blueangel

Ah, I see, so the "futility involved in trying to carry on a discussion like this" is because you don't have the facts to retort mine.

Exhibit 578 as to why it is impossible to have an intelligent discussion with you.

I'm done. I could be more productive banging my head against a wall, which I think I'll go do now.

[AlphaFrog]

Originally Posted by blueangel

In other words, you can't retort any of my facts either!

You're psycho.

Retort that fact, bitch.

[blueangel]

MEOW! Hissssssssss!