Is roll call a good idea?

[epchick]

Originally Posted by Alphagamuga

I could be wrong, and if I am, please don't prove it to me by posting my information

WOW....just wow! That's really wrong that you'd think that she'd try and prove a point by posting your information!!

[ZTAngel]

I don't think anyone could have ever thought that another sister would use information that was supposed to be for sister's only and post it on a public message board. That's the last thing on someone's mind when they post information in a roll call thread. Now everyone will have to be more careful after the recent incident.

[UGAalum94]

Originally Posted by epchick

WOW....just wow! That's really wrong that you'd think that she'd try and prove a point by posting your information!!

I didn't mean Jen particularly, and I'm sorry that it seemed that way. I just have seen stuff in the rush threads that when someone says, if "I don't say blah, blah, blah, then what the problem with posting my rush story?"
And then someone takes that as an invitation to show that posting is a bad idea by putting together all the information that they had just warned the PNM about.

I didn't what ANYONE to think that I was inviting them to prove me wrong by revealing stuff.

Sorry if it seemed like I was particularly accusing anyone. I meant it in a generic you kind of way.

[cutie_cat_4ever]

Please cut Alphagamuga some slack She was just concern about everyone's safety, especially after what happened to Tippie. Of course I'm not saying it's life threaten to Tippie at this point, but hell, it could be a possibility, right?

I personally think it's good to have a roll call, but only limit info to year, nickname, and school. Then sisters can search in their database. Of course I realized that not everyone has a nickname. Then in order to prove whether or not you're a member, just PM each other then search. Like Jen said, give them a choice.

And remember do a serach on google on your real name once in a while to make sure you don't have false stuff on the internet. I do it every so often

[_Lisa_]

Originally Posted by cutie_cat_4ever

And remember do a serach on google on your real name once in a while to make sure you don't have false stuff on the internet. I do it every so often

Googling my real name on the internet at work could get you fired, evidently there is a famous porn star that goes by the same name.

[cutie_cat_4ever]

Originally Posted by _Lisa_

Googling my real name on the internet at work could get you fired, evidently there is a famous porn star that goes by the same name.

You know what, mine does the same thing too, haha. And it was my dad who found out, lol...ehhh......though that porn star doesn't sound famous to me, lol......ehhh....*hides in corner*

[DSTCHAOS]

Originally Posted by Alphagamuga

I didn't mean Jen particularly, and I'm sorry that it seemed that way. I just have seen stuff in the rush threads that when someone says, if "I don't say blah, blah, blah, then what the problem with posting my rush story?"
And then someone takes that as an invitation to show that posting is a bad idea by putting together all the information that they had just warned the PNM about.

I didn't what ANYONE to think that I was inviting them to prove me wrong by revealing stuff.

Sorry if it seemed like I was particularly accusing anyone. I meant it in a generic you kind of way.

I knew what you meant.

You never know WHO would do something like that b/c people have their own things going on in their heads. It's cute to say you trust usernames but unless you know people personally (off of the internet), you don't know what they will or won't do. Hell, you can't be 100% about what people who you do know off of the internet will or won't do--you can only pray that you can trust people who you've known to be trustworthy.

[DSTCHAOS]

I think people are taking Alphagamunga too literally.

Sure, there's nothing "wrong" with roll call threads. We don't need national officers to post in them to know that. And roll call threads obviously are not mandatory--although some GCers are aggressive enough to make newbies think that if they don't post in a roll call thread they will be terrorized or something silly. But the general point that Alpha is making is for people to be cautious either way. Obviously people can find out info whether or not you post in roll call threads.

[KSig RC]

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS

I think people are taking Alphagamunga too literally.

Sure, there's nothing "wrong" with roll call threads. We don't need national officers to post in them to know that. And roll call threads obviously are not mandatory--although some GCers are aggressive enough to make newbies think that if they don't post in a roll call thread they will be terrorized or something silly. But the general point that Alpha is making is for people to be cautious either way. Obviously people can find out info whether or not you post in roll call threads.

I agree completely.

People who I converse with and deal with offline (like, say, chapter brothers, friends, etc) have relatively high access to 'personal' information - by necessity, because I'd like those people to be able to contact me if needed, etc. I personally would prefer not to be contacted by others - and not just for 'crazy' purposes, but because I don't need spam, junkmail, or Idi the Nigerian knocking on my door with SPECIAL OFFER MY FRIEND MAGIC MONEY MY FRIEND.

I think a large part of the divide here shows the strong differences between people, in terms of public face, career needs, and all those interrelated things that really make us different. I don't blame a single person for not posting in a roll call thread - the whole argument seems somewhat petty, and really seems like we're "fishing" for "perps" . . . I especially don't blame people who work in a well-connected industry, or rely on clientele or reputation. My company, we personally search for myspaces and livejournals for every analyst we hire . . . most people don't even consider that. They probably should - it's insane.

Giving people the tools to capitalize on their insane insane insane-ness might not be the best Internet strategy, and hostility against those who are trying to prevent that seems somewhat near-sighted.

[cutie_cat_4ever]

Agree, unless you want to be like Erica Rose from The Bachelor, that's a different story:

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...ndid=107462729

That's her myspace.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

I agree completely.

People who I converse with and deal with offline (like, say, chapter brothers, friends, etc) have relatively high access to 'personal' information - by necessity, because I'd like those people to be able to contact me if needed, etc. I personally would prefer not to be contacted by others - and not just for 'crazy' purposes, but because I don't need spam, junkmail, or Idi the Nigerian knocking on my door with SPECIAL OFFER MY FRIEND MAGIC MONEY MY FRIEND.

I think a large part of the divide here shows the strong differences between people, in terms of public face, career needs, and all those interrelated things that really make us different. I don't blame a single person for not posting in a roll call thread - the whole argument seems somewhat petty, and really seems like we're "fishing" for "perps" . . . I especially don't blame people who work in a well-connected industry, or rely on clientele or reputation. My company, we personally search for myspaces and livejournals for every analyst we hire . . . most people don't even consider that. They probably should - it's insane.

Giving people the tools to capitalize on their insane insane insane-ness might not be the best Internet strategy, and hostility against those who are trying to prevent that seems somewhat near-sighted.

On the other hand, if an individual starts posting on GC and self-identifies as a member of an organization, the members of that organization then have an interest in determining whether or not that person actually is what she says she is.

If you post under a name and don't claim an organization, it's no one's business. Once you start speaking as a member of that organization, the organization itself has a vested interest in knowing whether or not you have the authority to speak as one of them. For a place like GC, I think this matters a lot. Parents and potential new members come here to research organizations. I sure as hell don't want a non-member making members look bad.

That said, I can understand the issue with self-identifying to anyone who claims to be a member of the organization which they are verifying for.

There are definitely competing policies at work here, but since this is "Greek Chat," a place which as you know is for members of GLOs, I think the concerns of organizations ought to win over individual concerns every single time (when reasonable).

Obviously, I don't really give a damn about my privacy here. It would take very little effort for anyone here to figure out who I am, where I live, my phone number, etc. I really don't care though. I try not to give anyone a reason to want to hunt me down.

[AXO Alum]

Originally Posted by Kevin

If you post under a name and don't claim an organization, it's no one's business. Once you start speaking as a member of that organization, the organization itself has a vested interest in knowing whether or not you have the authority to speak as one of them. For a place like GC, I think this matters a lot. Parents and potential new members come here to research organizations. I sure as hell don't want a non-member making members look bad.

DITTO! Same goes for people who try to speak on other organization's policies & such!

I have been on GC longer than most people - there aren't many that are left of the originals - so if I ask an alleged AXO via PM to fill me in on her info, then she shouldn't have a problem with that - I'm not someone who just showed up on GC the day before asking for that information. And I sure the heck would NEVER dream of using that information in the way that BA did.

[KSigkid]

Originally Posted by KSig RC

I think a large part of the divide here shows the strong differences between people, in terms of public face, career needs, and all those interrelated things that really make us different. I don't blame a single person for not posting in a roll call thread - the whole argument seems somewhat petty, and really seems like we're "fishing" for "perps" . . . I especially don't blame people who work in a well-connected industry, or rely on clientele or reputation. My company, we personally search for myspaces and livejournals for every analyst we hire . . . most people don't even consider that. They probably should - it's insane.

Exactly - I don't think it's feasible for every member to be able to post or share enough personal information to confirm their membership in said organization; I think that reluctance throws up a red flag to a number of people on the board. It's a fine line between looking like a "perp," and keeping your identity sufficiently hidden so as not to jeopardize job/scholastic/outside interests.

If I had come to GC now at this point in my scholastic life and career, I probably would not have shared as much information about myself as I did when I first started on GC in 2001. The fact is that anyone with enough time on their hands can probably figure out who I am (not even mentioning the fact that I've met a handful of GC members in real life).

I guess I can understand both sides of it, and it comes out as a no-win situation. People want to protect their organization, but individuals want to protect themselves as well.