» GC Stats |
Members: 329,740
Threads: 115,667
Posts: 2,205,100
|
Welcome to our newest member, atylerpttz1668 |
|
 |
|

11-29-2006, 12:34 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tippie-toeing through the tulips
Posts: 1,396
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKA_Monet
I find it extremely interesting and curious about what happened the Imams. It hurts to see men become dehumanized. We will never know what was exactly said before they boarded the plane. Non-muslims often are fearful when they speak to Muslims about their faith. So it is conceivable that the other passengers became extremely fearful.
However, my conspiracy theorist gene is activated and I think since US Airways was attempting a hostile takeover Delta Airlines, that to buttress themselves against the takeover bid, Delta Airlines planted folks KNOWING that US Airways probably does "strip searches"...
Besides all the Airlines are probably planting folks who do buckwild things that would "offend" or "scare" the personnel into doing "thangs" beyond the US Constitutionally given rights... I.e. the breast feeding woman...
I do have 2 ironic stories about all of this drama on the plane:
1) One of 9-11 terrorists was a student in one of the classes I taught... He only showed up to one class. Apparently, he dropped it. It was Biology Lab 101.
2) My brother in law is former Atlanta PD. He was ready that if he saw funkiness on a plane, like 9-11, we was going to go sit next to homey and say "Wassup H----? It's on..." What was ironic, was on the show 24 on Fox, the "terrorist character's name" was the same as my brother IL said...
|
If it was just a matter of praying, that would be one thing, but there was a lot more to it. Witnesses say they were angry, and making anti-American statements before boarding the plane.
Once on board, they left their seats and sat in what is recognized as a pattern Al Qaieda uses to test the security of a plane-- blocking both the entrances and exits.
They also asked for seat belt extenders that they did not need. Then they tucked them below their seats. Witnesses say they then made more anti-American comments.
Please read this op/ed piece in the Washington Times. It may change how you feel about the incident.
http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/200...5036-7940r.htm
and this editorial from the Toledo Blade
http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll...311/-1/OPINION
and this one from the Star Tribune
http://www.startribune.com/562/story/833103.html
Are we expected to accept all behavior, no matter how suspicious and how outlandish, in the name of political correctness?
|

11-29-2006, 01:12 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Who you calling "boy"? The name's Hand Banana . . .
Posts: 6,984
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueangel
Once on board, they left their seats and sat in what is recognized as a pattern Al Qaieda uses to test the security of a plane-- blocking both the entrances and exits.
|
Could I get a primary-source cite on this? The Washington Times op/ed self-refers, and refers to another op/ed piece - any major outlets reporting this? Also, who recognized this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueangel
They also asked for seat belt extenders that they did not need. Then they tucked them below their seats. Witnesses say they then made more anti-American comments.
|
While the seat belt extensions are really up for interpretation, I'm 100% sure we don't want to rely on "making anti-American statements" in any way whatsoever - unless you're comfortable pissing on the Constitution?
Also the reports conflict, saying they made anti-American references in Arabic without any explanation of how this was known . . . this is quickly turning into journalistic/editorial onanism, in my opinion, when it comes to determining "facts."
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueangel
Are we expected to accept all behavior, no matter how suspicious and how outlandish, in the name of political correctness?
|
I do agree with you here - I just don't think this is very cut-and-dried, and I think media reports are really pooping the bed here. It's a soapbox more than an illustrative example for either side.
|

11-29-2006, 03:16 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tippie-toeing through the tulips
Posts: 1,396
|
|
Quote:
While the seat belt extensions are really up for interpretation, I'm 100% sure we don't want to rely on "making anti-American statements" in any way whatsoever - unless you're comfortable pissing on the Constitution?
|
You can't say "bomb" in an airport, and you can't yell "fire." There is a limit to the Constitution. While putting down the U.S. does not violate "freedom of speech"-- it was not a single reason why they were removed from the airplane. It is the combination of their suspicious actions which resulted in their removal.
"A half-dozen Muslims were removed from a US Airways flight in Minneapolis on Monday evening after nervous passengers alerted the flight crew about suspicious behavior.
The men, who officials later learned were Islamic religious leaders, refused to leave the plane and were escorted by security off Flight 300 from Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport to Phoenix at 6:30 p.m.
Conflicting reports say the men were praying in the concourse or on the plane, and a Minnesota television reported that the imams were chanting "Allah, Allah, Allah," as they left the plane.
Douglas Hagmann, director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, a private organization that investigates terrorist threats, said his contacts are reporting the men did begin the prayers in the concourse, then continued prayers and discussions once on board.
"One of the passengers who understands Arabic passed a note to the crew that what she heard, she did not like," Mr. Hagmann said.
Patrick Hogan, spokesman for the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, said the men reportedly made anti-American statements relating to the Iraq war, asked to change seats once inside the cabin, and that one requested an extender to make his seat belt larger even though he did not appear to need it.
"There was some peculiar behavior," Mr. Hagmann said."http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20061121-105648-5375r.htm
Quote:
Also the reports conflict, saying they made anti-American references in Arabic without any explanation of how this was known . . . this is quickly turning into journalistic/editorial onanism, in my opinion, when it comes to determining "facts."
|
You're right, the reports are different. It is a "he said, she said" account of what was said. There will always be different interpretations by witnesses as to what actually happened. However, news reports say that one of the passengers who understood Arabic notified the crew what she heard:
"One of the passengers who understands Arabic passed a note to the crew that what she heard, she did not like," Mr. Hagmann said."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...5648-5375r.htm
Quote:
I do agree with you here - I just don't think this is very cut-and-dried, and I think media reports are really pooping the bed here. It's a soapbox more than an illustrative example for either side.
|
Here are some other accounts from news sources:
" An airport police report said a US Airways manager said three of the men had one-way tickets and no checked baggage. A passenger told police the men were praying and making critical comments about the war in Iraq. Some of the men also asked for seat belt extensions even though a flight attendant told police she thought they didn't need them."http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S20152.html?cat=1
"The imams who claimed two first-class seats said their tickets were upgraded. The gate agent told police that when the imams asked to be upgraded, they were told no such seats were available. Nevertheless, the two men were seated in first class when removed.
A flight attendant said one of the men made two trips to the rear of the plane to talk to the imam during boarding, and again when the flight was delayed because of their behavior. Aviation officials, including air marshals and pilots, said these actions alone would not warrant a second look, but the combination is suspicious. "
http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...522r_page2.htm
Patrick Hogan, spokesman for the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, said the airline asked airport police to remove the six men from the Minneapolis to Phoenix flight because their actions were "arousing some concerns" among both passengers and crew.
He said the men had been praying at the gate area but he did not know if they tried to pray once at their seats inside the plane.
He also said some witnesses reported the men were making anti-American statements involving the Iraq war, asked to change seats once inside the cabin, that one requested an extender to make his seat belt larger even though he did not appear to need it and that in general "there was some peculiar behavior."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...112100687.html
|

11-29-2006, 06:20 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta - Canada
Posts: 3,190
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueangel
An airport police report said a US Airways manager said three of the men had one-way tickets and no checked baggage. A passenger told police the men were praying and making critical comments about the war in Iraq. Some of the men also asked for seat belt extensions even though a flight attendant told police she thought they didn't need
|
Oh noes... they're making critical comments about the Iraq War, were Praying, and some even <gasp> had no checked baggage  Well if this is the standard for detecting terrorists I can see a hell of a lot of empty planes domestically.
__________________
Λ Χ Α
University of Toronto Alum
EE755
"Cave ab homine unius libri"
|

11-29-2006, 06:56 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,255
|
|
...says the guy from a country which hasn't had terrorist hijackings lately...
|

11-29-2006, 07:34 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta - Canada
Posts: 3,190
|
|
Fair enough (they just blow ours up)....
Anyways then, riddle me this: Why are nations that have been subject to more terrorist attacks and hijackings not over-reacting like this as well?
__________________
Λ Χ Α
University of Toronto Alum
EE755
"Cave ab homine unius libri"
|

11-29-2006, 07:51 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tippie-toeing through the tulips
Posts: 1,396
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RACooper
Fair enough (they just blow ours up)....
Anyways then, riddle me this: Why are nations that have been subject to more terrorist attacks and hijackings not over-reacting like this as well?
|
You are assuming our nation is "over-reacting" at airports. I think it is "under-reacting."
Maybe if our airport security was as stringent as Israel's.. 911 might not have happened.
|

11-29-2006, 07:52 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,036
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RACooper
Fair enough (they just blow ours up)....
Anyways then, riddle me this: Why are nations that have been subject to more terrorist attacks and hijackings not over-reacting like this as well?
|
Is it really over reacting? Last time I checked this was a new thing for the US.....you know, jacking airplanes and then flying them into buildings. Perhaps if we handled things the way they do in Israel and other middle eastern countries, it wouldn't have happened. I'd rather an airport be overly cautious than nonchalantly brushing off a bunch of Muslim men with one way tickets and no luggage who are praying to Allah before boarding a plane. Maybe they are more tolerant up there in ole Canada. I dunno. Also, you're an idiot.
|

11-29-2006, 01:31 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,930
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueangel
Once on board, they left their seats and sat in what is recognized as a pattern Al Qaieda uses to test the security of a plane-- blocking both the entrances and exits.
|
even i get up and walk around - mostly cause i hate to sit still for too long
NOT DIRECTED AT ANYBODY IN PARTICULAR -->
but people will ALWAYS try to justify their paranoia and racism after the fact so that they can feel better about themselves and not look like a total bigot
- m
__________________
she's everything and a little bit more
she's mine she's yours
she's an alpha gam girl...
A GD
|

11-29-2006, 01:44 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,578
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrely girl
even i get up and walk around - mostly cause i hate to sit still for too long
NOT DIRECTED AT ANYBODY IN PARTICULAR -->
but people will ALWAYS try to justify their paranoia and racism after the fact so that they can feel better about themselves and not look like a total bigot
- m
|
I agree. I think it's just simpler to say "Yes, we were paranoid and biased but we were scared and our decision was made under those conditions."
__________________
From the SigmaTo the K!
Polyamorous, Pansexual and Proud of it!
It Gets Better
|

11-29-2006, 01:57 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: partying like it's 1999
Posts: 5,199
|
|
I wonder what people would think if they ever flew El Al. My flight to Tel Aviv had a bunch of rabbis (including the one from my youth group) flying out there for a convention. In the middle of the flight, they all got up, went to the back of the plane, and started praying (we're talking at least 20 men here).
|

11-29-2006, 03:01 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orlando..unfortunately....
Posts: 1,014
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KLPDaisy
I wonder what people would think if they ever flew El Al. My flight to Tel Aviv had a bunch of rabbis (including the one from my youth group) flying out there for a convention. In the middle of the flight, they all got up, went to the back of the plane, and started praying (we're talking at least 20 men here).
|
No one would probably say anything because we all know that only Muslims kill other people.
|

12-02-2006, 02:31 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Taking lessons at Cobra Kai Karate!
Posts: 14,928
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KLPDaisy
I wonder what people would think if they ever flew El Al. My flight to Tel Aviv had a bunch of rabbis (including the one from my youth group) flying out there for a convention. In the middle of the flight, they all got up, went to the back of the plane, and started praying (we're talking at least 20 men here).
|
When a group of Jewish rabbis blows up a plane, then people will get concerned. When a group of Jewish rabbis blows up planes often, hijacks them, etc. then Jewish rabbis will get a reputation. And when Jewish people in general either sit idle or don't consistently denounce these individuals without offering some kind of excuses (ie they were upset at American foreign policy), then Jews in general may be considered potential terrorists. That's just the way it is. People may not like it. But that's how it is. And most people are OK with infringing on a few people's civil liberties to make sure thousands don't die. Plus El Al conducts one of the most comprehensive security checks of any airline. There are armed undercover guards throughout the planes, the planes usually leave from secure terminals, and they even ask Jewish people questions on their upbringing to make sure they are who they say they are. So I doubt many people would worry about anyone praying on El Al.
-Rudey
|

12-02-2006, 04:18 PM
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The beach
Posts: 7,948
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudey
When a group of Jewish rabbis blows up a plane, then people will get concerned. When a group of Jewish rabbis blows up planes often, hijacks them, etc. then Jewish rabbis will get a reputation. And when Jewish people in general either sit idle or don't consistently denounce these individuals without offering some kind of excuses (ie they were upset at American foreign policy), then Jews in general may be considered potential terrorists. That's just the way it is. People may not like it. But that's how it is. And most people are OK with infringing on a few people's civil liberties to make sure thousands don't die. Plus El Al conducts one of the most comprehensive security checks of any airline. There are armed undercover guards throughout the planes, the planes usually leave from secure terminals, and they even ask Jewish people questions on their upbringing to make sure they are who they say they are. So I doubt many people would worry about anyone praying on El Al.
-Rudey
|
El Al's security checks are amazing and I truly believe every airline should do it. We would never have another 9/11 again. Yes, the boarding process takes longer but it's thorough. When I flew to Jerusalem with my family, they questioned us about holidays, prayers, where we live, etc.
I'd be willing to stand in line longer and be asked a bunch of questions if it means my flight is safer.
__________________
ZTA
|

12-02-2006, 06:53 PM
|
GreekChat Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kansas City, Kansas USA
Posts: 23,584
|
|
The problem is a knee jerk reaction isn't?
How in the hell does a lady of grey/blue hair in a wheel chair try to get on an Airline and have to take her orthopedict shoes off to be checked?l
Or say a much maturer man with shorts and polo shirt have to take his shoes off for a bomb? Be scanned with a wand to see if any bombs are found in his tennis shoes?
Oh, maybe the Old lady in the wheel chair had bomb in her wheel chair or the Mature older man had explosives in his tennies?
God, I miss the good old days, when you had your pass, got on the plane, had a drink or food (Real Food) and just get to where you were going.
__________________
LCA
LX Z # 1
Alumni
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|