Quote:
Originally Posted by BootyKBG
Clarify the expectations of your sorority in the constitution and bylaws. I CANNOT say enough about the value of this. Although KBG is not a local, we are a small national and have had to rely on these documents regularly. What is the purpose of your sorority? What are the rules as far as procedure? Do you have classifications on member standing? What are the official roles of the officers? Do you have penalties for not meeting expectations? Also, don't be afraid to make rules on wearing the letters. Someone who is so poisonous to your group should have to prove she is worthy of the letters before being allowed to wear them (and I DEFINITELY don't mean by hazing!) If she can't even get your letters right, what right does she have to wear them? She should first understand the meaning behind the choice of letters, the rituals and traditions you are forming, and the TRUE meaning of sisterhood.
|
Co-sign
I still also agree that those two should be removed. Some organizations actually have it in their history that they started with X number of founders, but the organization was officially founded by Y. If those two weak links are as "poisonous" as you stated, then they will probably have your organization disbanded and nothing but dust by November 2007. You know what you have to do, and I believe you'd get a great start by mutually or forcibly removing those UCGs.
Threaded Mode
