Quote:
Originally Posted by centaur532
I'll say it before anyone else gets to it.
The difference between undergrad recruitment and alumni initiation is that undergrad recruitment is the main mode of intake for the GLO and alumni initiation makes up a very small percentage of new sisters each year. Therefore, collegiate recruitment is a unanimous agreement and policy among all NPCs. Because AI is so individualized and circumstantial, no uninitiated person should be or needs to be privy to that information.
I am beating a dead horse when I say this, but the sorority approaches you, not the other way round. If a member thinks you're right for their org, they tell you, they start the ball rolling. That's how you come into knowledge of AI policy.
The point of removing the list is so that people don't go through the list and think 'hmmm, I'll only pursue these GLOs because it's easy.'
If they want you, they find you.
|
But I think that is where individual members of GLO's and their HQ's policies are inconsistent. If the sororities didn't want qualified women to contact them about AI, then they would refuse to set up introductions with the local AA, but we all know that doesn't happen in all cases.
I never thought that the list of which GLO's did AI's in any way, referenced that it was an easy process. In fact, I think there was something printed specifically to tell readers to NOT make that very incorrect interpretation. I don't think the forum should be dropped b/c people can't read and follow given directions.
Threaded Mode
