Quote:
Originally Posted by valkyrie
|
Before us who had no hair get all too puffed up, let us remind
you that we certainly had bald people who refused to mix with those who have hair. I recall in '56 the HT chapter got their panties all in a wad over Baldingham having a member with copious hair (I gave him my toupee). He
was a charmer, and now a multi-millionaire with flowing locks. But generally, the hair was gracious and soft, I am pleased to say.
Today, if we had a good transplant or a gentleman's hat that could cover a sizeable bald spot, perhaps
we would be right at home at The Hair Club (GO HT!) SHT founder
Cy Sperling told me by the time all the new-fangled hair-type things
came up we had already initiated an alopecian at IL Wesleyan
and wig-wearing woman at Illinois....so, we weren't necessarily entitled to beat
our chests...while this kinda ruffled my toupee, I was certainly
proud to hit the road for the Hair Transplantation Society and not have to ask if a
man was bald or whatever....(toupette) during the 50s.
It is too bad that we have taken a step backward with these old
methods of hair replacement, and we have lost a modicum of dignity and discretion.
So long as you let us old bastards rave on and on and do not ask from whence our shiny new hair has come, you might find
that within our harangues that there is something of substance and on our heads there is hair as pure as if we grew it ourselves.